IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [payload] WGLC for draft-ietf-payload-vp8-03 ending March 1st

"Roni Even" <ron.even.tlv@gmail.com> Sun, 04 March 2012 12:09 UTC

Return-Path: <ron.even.tlv@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: payload@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: payload@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91B9121F8526 for <payload@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 4 Mar 2012 04:09:53 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.46
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.46 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.139, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0fgcJGO+tjdQ for <payload@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 4 Mar 2012 04:09:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ey0-f172.google.com (mail-ey0-f172.google.com [209.85.215.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1B1D21F851A for <payload@ietf.org>; Sun, 4 Mar 2012 04:09:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: by eaaq11 with SMTP id q11so1055512eaa.31 for <payload@ietf.org>; Sun, 04 Mar 2012 04:09:51 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of ron.even.tlv@gmail.com designates 10.14.100.207 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.14.100.207;
Authentication-Results: mr.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of ron.even.tlv@gmail.com designates 10.14.100.207 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=ron.even.tlv@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=ron.even.tlv@gmail.com
Received: from mr.google.com ([10.14.100.207]) by 10.14.100.207 with SMTP id z55mr850240eef.104.1330862991939 (num_hops = 1); Sun, 04 Mar 2012 04:09:51 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:references:in-reply-to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:x-mailer:thread-index :content-language; bh=XQ4jJzNoGz66ohvz3i/abt88Puxa/llZUPVBdyvRhjo=; b=EfmVVkPxHtFklWxV5bMEAfRNKyV7Loooyxph64uJKXvtXjoxfxjU3s9coKx/jd3F/r xC4Cn8Hbrhu12hU9DdAldaeEc8bQTHF4Fg1J5sUPlugEf/3UXqfdXoIdolvZI+tSpEcc KDw62cc19q2ki9TWrhKUas44MEepvZvQ3szisyeXhIytqy/s4bQ1T3zMipsZTkONQSl3 rstuAptVptBdzhKIxQXqvhOuQMXngjtPsUTtFgh9lv3vMZIYb/+tygqqjSPunzbB5dG0 C5Nvw5fTt23J2wf8d3oMjw4xhM1uYSy7rFNf2Z9phznoYxbXhAOZ2A+M0R8hb9+d1I06 wtqg==
Received: by 10.14.100.207 with SMTP id z55mr639639eef.104.1330862991828; Sun, 04 Mar 2012 04:09:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from windows8d787f9 (bzq-109-67-208-29.red.bezeqint.net. [109.67.208.29]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id o11sm39014775eef.4.2012.03.04.04.09.48 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sun, 04 Mar 2012 04:09:49 -0800 (PST)
From: Roni Even <ron.even.tlv@gmail.com>
To: "'Ali C. Begen (abegen)'" <abegen@cisco.com>, payload@ietf.org
References: <C15918F2FCDA0243A7C919DA7C4BE99403FAF9@xmb-rcd-x01-p.cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <C15918F2FCDA0243A7C919DA7C4BE99403FAF9@xmb-rcd-x01-p.cisco.com>
Date: Sun, 04 Mar 2012 14:08:45 +0200
Message-ID: <4f535b8d.0b5f0e0a.0445.ffffd49a@mx.google.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0
Thread-Index: AczrRVxjReHrfWv2TROUTdcmKeO0cAOt+NyQ
Content-Language: en-us
Subject: Re: [payload] WGLC for draft-ietf-payload-vp8-03 ending March 1st
X-BeenThere: payload@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Audio/Video Transport Payloads working group discussion list <payload.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/payload>, <mailto:payload-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/payload>
List-Post: <mailto:payload@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:payload-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/payload>, <mailto:payload-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 04 Mar 2012 12:09:53 -0000

Hi,
Sorry for the late review.
I have some comments.

1. In section 4.2 the PictureID definition talk about the msb being a flag.
Why not show it in figure 2.

2. The first paragraph in section 4.3 talk about 10 octets version of the
uncompressed data chunk, I could not find where the 10 octet version is
specified. The example in 4.5.1 has the 3 octets version.


3. In the example in 4.5.2 is this a discardable packet in which case N
should be 1.

4. In section 6.2.1 the reference to SDP should be RFC 4566. Also in payload
specification we typically use the media subtype and not MIME subtype.

Roni Even
As individual

> -----Original Message-----
> From: payload-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:payload-bounces@ietf.org] On
> Behalf Of Ali C. Begen (abegen)
> Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2012 8:35 PM
> To: payload@ietf.org
> Subject: [payload] WGLC for draft-ietf-payload-vp8-03 ending March 1st
> 
> WG,
> 
> This is to start the WGLC for the VP8 draft.
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-payload-vp8/
> 
> Please send your comments and approvals to the payload list by March
> 1st.
> 
> Authors, you need to separate the references as informative vs.
> normative but please wait till the WGLC ends for a revision.
> 
> -acbegen
> _______________________________________________
> payload mailing list
> payload@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/payload

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email