IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [payload] draft-ramalho-payload-g7110-00 to be discussed inAVTEXT

Hadriel Kaplan <HKaplan@acmepacket.com> Wed, 27 July 2011 05:49 UTC

Return-Path: <HKaplan@acmepacket.com>
X-Original-To: payload@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: payload@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7625221F8680; Tue, 26 Jul 2011 22:49:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.425
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.425 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.174, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vDs8bT7galCI; Tue, 26 Jul 2011 22:49:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ETMail2.acmepacket.com (etmail2.acmepacket.com [216.41.24.9]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1B4D21F85EE; Tue, 26 Jul 2011 22:49:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.acmepacket.com (216.41.24.7) by ETMail2.acmepacket.com (216.41.24.9) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.1.240.5; Wed, 27 Jul 2011 01:49:21 -0400
Received: from mailbox1.acmepacket.com ([216.41.24.12]) by mail ([127.0.0.1]) with mapi; Wed, 27 Jul 2011 01:49:19 -0400
From: Hadriel Kaplan <HKaplan@acmepacket.com>
To: "Michael Ramalho (mramalho)" <mramalho@cisco.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2011 01:49:18 -0400
Thread-Topic: [payload] draft-ramalho-payload-g7110-00 to be discussed inAVTEXT
Thread-Index: AcxMIO1YGtl69Y2bTSOCOvRr/V940A==
Message-ID: <90B879AD-0009-4ED4-870F-815197BA06BD@acmepacket.com>
References: <DCD4D03D-93A3-4EC9-A099-F22D92DE4BAC@acmepacket.com> <999109E6BC528947A871CDEB5EB908A0044E2EEB@XMB-RCD-209.cisco.com> <CDB75F50-9298-4711-8C0B-968B47D3EE10@acmepacket.com> <999109E6BC528947A871CDEB5EB908A0044E3025@XMB-RCD-209.cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <999109E6BC528947A871CDEB5EB908A0044E3025@XMB-RCD-209.cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAQAAAUA=
Cc: "avtext@ietf.org" <avtext@ietf.org>, "payload@ietf.org" <payload@ietf.org>, "draft-ramalho-payload-g7110@tools.ietf.org" <draft-ramalho-payload-g7110@tools.ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [payload] draft-ramalho-payload-g7110-00 to be discussed inAVTEXT
X-BeenThere: payload@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Audio/Video Transport Payloads working group discussion list <payload.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/payload>, <mailto:payload-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/payload>
List-Post: <mailto:payload@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:payload-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/payload>, <mailto:payload-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2011 05:49:21 -0000

On Jul 26, 2011, at 4:32 PM, Michael Ramalho (mramalho) wrote:
>  Like I said earlier, I have a longer talk
> on the subject and would be happy to discuss further. Perhaps I should
> have asked for a slot in the behave WG for these issues?

Yes a presentation discussion will help, but I don't think BEHAVE would be the right WG.
IMHO, most of this draft belongs in PAYLOAD, but all of section 6 belongs somewhere else, maybe MMUSIC.  Just my 2 cents though.

-hadriel

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email