Re: [Pce] WG adoption poll for draft-stone-pce-local-protection-enforcement-02.

Dhruv Dhody <dd@dhruvdhody.com> Wed, 11 November 2020 12:55 UTC

Return-Path: <dd@dhruvdhody.com>
X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EC493A10CE for <pce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 Nov 2020 04:55:36 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=dhruvdhody-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xL_kyXW4X-sr for <pce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 Nov 2020 04:55:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pg1-x529.google.com (mail-pg1-x529.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::529]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2E9D03A10CF for <pce@ietf.org>; Wed, 11 Nov 2020 04:55:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pg1-x529.google.com with SMTP id z24so1413219pgk.3 for <pce@ietf.org>; Wed, 11 Nov 2020 04:55:35 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=dhruvdhody-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=v6t1n0w6GNZ69sr711Q0/22t6TnrRyajnf8anrrPD04=; b=WlFjuquPJs0mV7g7Nts1SF/BVxSBwskG5AzgOphnKn76kCKmrRw0ZZkfYklNf4zk7q MsFTjpvL59UCx9bn6E9nlQPm2TjpMWIcJXmOYlAUrqiNEZOph15AkkCQhvy0pRG+nam5 ej8wD7uiD5qsekhTEVOd8lDbpaaA/zCjyj26ZdFZZWNCZKN0PPSlhiNIf+IApgHVrZK0 1v3EjaO/bkHR+ggzA9rAN4u2p7aVVTElfTmdJs8GN9HrmKtA5MSfJsoCmoKpqw+xkyrj bTBtDMkH203YQ7KnAu84bDbRkW2RiJl4V5314NBSFAwvMKQE9v7ehSUIGlW/7WYp3RJd XcfQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=v6t1n0w6GNZ69sr711Q0/22t6TnrRyajnf8anrrPD04=; b=Gm6w0h1NWZ3NL01TXVWh25D7uMsPpk/WJyJ+Dwn2iUBfW91iI2vCZOBwLswxeqlDe5 CmG5zyIHbYMhPhtumo01MKhh+WWIt0DF2h7ZWmDp3glA7I12hHagAfI8fvFBq85Rvi54 wtcYkRLz28zPiBVxA+8N1ZkXVY/gLxkOExJjAQ2wgaf4/P+NvB381+kIi4MogqmDes0o j8GuTfbK9xJBpjA1HZP9+ByVObCjOKnw21Bb2aVABSFO+jrxR4fSZFKieTk2LLR0C8nw vbkUIs3Xpe1CJLj7zZj8YgRUqBrTLdxJAxl4ILUNbH7nZ+24s4EeZROXBwbAATIeUlHr pAsg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532cr67hAxg3678MVcfvgw1NcO8Axuj8C6Tguc2qMcQ2laS4xYgR i02IlWLadq7vZUn3pLLG3NIkesJUPuS+skRHrRkTvKXCakPOAMYh
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxSgBC0BUPzA63ozoD4lVxrWSARUDPRjGubahyPZFL0nMfwPlxQGBsg12bsY00XqugvWI4M217dhgJhmQdMmYA=
X-Received: by 2002:a65:47ca:: with SMTP id f10mr20600184pgs.298.1605099334473; Wed, 11 Nov 2020 04:55:34 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAP7zK5Y1nZL1kfyTv3pRPFZb4+9fi+awFCC9aU1FQ+POgM-KUw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAP7zK5Y1nZL1kfyTv3pRPFZb4+9fi+awFCC9aU1FQ+POgM-KUw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Dhruv Dhody <dd@dhruvdhody.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2020 18:24:58 +0530
Message-ID: <CAP7zK5YhR6kY35unPkYdp1OLu2g6BmBbdcvDgOqqBBm=h9p83A@mail.gmail.com>
To: pce@ietf.org
Cc: draft-stone-pce-local-protection-enforcement@ietf.org, Vishnu Pavan Beeram <vishnupavan@gmail.com>, pce-chairs <pce-chairs@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/3Pw3c9Sewl8icSjgIQgCSaumAQQ>
Subject: Re: [Pce] WG adoption poll for draft-stone-pce-local-protection-enforcement-02.
X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Path Computation Element <pce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pce/>
List-Post: <mailto:pce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2020 12:55:36 -0000

Hi WG,

The WG adoption poll is closed, the response was less than what we
would have liked. The responses were all supportive without any
objections. All authors have
responded to the IPR check. We can adopt it as a WG document.

There is a suggestion on the table to make things generic from Pavan,
we request authors to discuss this with Pavan (preferably on the
list).

Hi Authors,

Please post 'draft-ietf-pce-local-protection-enforcement-00' when the
submission is allowed again with no other change.

Thanks!
Dhruv & Julien

On Wed, Oct 21, 2020 at 7:10 PM Dhruv Dhody <dd@dhruvdhody.com> wrote:
>
> Hi WG,
>
> This email begins the WG adoption poll for
> draft-stone-pce-local-protection-enforcement-02.
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-stone-pce-local-protection-enforcement-02
>
> Should this draft be adopted by the PCE WG? Please state your reasons
> - Why / Why not? What needs to be fixed before or after adoption? Are
> you willing to work on this draft? Review comments should be posted to
> the list.
>
> This adoption poll will end on 9th Nov 2020 (Monday).
>
> Thanks!
> Dhruv & Julien