IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Pce] WG adoption poll for draft-stone-pce-local-protection-enforcement-02.

Tarek Saad <tsaad.net@gmail.com> Wed, 04 November 2020 18:14 UTC

Return-Path: <tsaad.net@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E28653A13F8 for <pce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Nov 2020 10:14:36 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Y2nmjNZ6cd4O for <pce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Nov 2020 10:14:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-oi1-x236.google.com (mail-oi1-x236.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::236]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 79BE33A13F7 for <pce@ietf.org>; Wed, 4 Nov 2020 10:14:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-oi1-x236.google.com with SMTP id w145so17454882oie.9 for <pce@ietf.org>; Wed, 04 Nov 2020 10:14:31 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:subject:thread-topic:thread-index:date:message-id :references:in-reply-to:accept-language:content-language :content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=4/a2vEuyDoktyLYFR6Kv8A8daja+AYVPf0eAXfP2i8A=; b=agUzWirQYIpDVO6UelfR7+GA/yiHCtoHmFwE5J0QsuHgGbCJs2w1ZJNEiR0evhpx6O DqzCwD17yuF+2L0kMdF9e1l7oeeGPOkgLT6vqtb2V7z+kLvTjuhe56L5Qi2bvl7ilBsO wVQlLaJUCwU8nERwVBM6a+mIF5J4YXNdF+b7z+3aXpEVZV2WuSKnbahVQU6Tn8rAo99E GprUcJYeiGEpt1aHEDe5I81wyWnizMEtCcxBaAmyQl2H7/0lyVu87Udobm0dC7oWopYd jpEW5e/NGFuM+0vwN/xlhBh8KTxc+uJYSK5dRrUYi2TDOwlS0lwspSi2l1pBsCLPgYwr Tlpg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:subject:thread-topic:thread-index:date :message-id:references:in-reply-to:accept-language:content-language :content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=4/a2vEuyDoktyLYFR6Kv8A8daja+AYVPf0eAXfP2i8A=; b=GmFwNHEBgJ8G5sHjtnWwKBRPWV7et5AZawydlm4HtuR56yJMieVa4beArgL5vsyBPS U3LtrcKq/wXL1rLKHVaji6t7thv+/9dhaoVT7MMBmowmETlvKuagiIh7nmFdCTC0K5/t HRWiRM0pGsZJcFlfKI+xzAO2WOvA5j/mawBmEnilB2b6twmxcd4qB5876yD/aevPnle7 VryU9wCLRtRowcFha2P3WRZ5fmfAHPbSdExg7ZJPOO44UNm0PVbYJ+btWHmaCJYFRom0 BEGa6aeQD9hQgGct5tevyAtC4403hHQXBBMVFUvAHTBw8Y+gDFBsNBe4cEJ+rgFm1J8C NbGw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530XaAolj5O1OIrAo7vJ1sgfjQ9QRRVCMmwerJtjH5592+uo1EaF 1vzynqpUN1FY/XeZK3jYz5U=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzccOiSNCViCT9Dhf6Eok7jkJfUaQ2otcy2IH3bn6mWtwr0mY6VJGl6aYsDPxOkzotsQ/bGJg==
X-Received: by 2002:aca:348a:: with SMTP id b132mr3136386oia.151.1604513670511; Wed, 04 Nov 2020 10:14:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from DM5PR1901MB2150.namprd19.prod.outlook.com ([2603:1036:4:9e::5]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id o127sm203512oif.10.2020.11.04.10.14.29 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 04 Nov 2020 10:14:29 -0800 (PST)
From: Tarek Saad <tsaad.net@gmail.com>
To: "Stone, Andrew (Nokia - CA/Ottawa)" <andrew.stone@nokia.com>, Dhruv Dhody <dd@dhruvdhody.com>, "pce@ietf.org" <pce@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Pce] WG adoption poll for draft-stone-pce-local-protection-enforcement-02.
Thread-Index: AXdGK1Jap4lB0iStKO98JDOs3tGKJ77Dh5GAgBXOdZ0=
X-MS-Exchange-MessageSentRepresentingType: 1
Date: Wed, 04 Nov 2020 18:14:28 +0000
Message-ID: <DM5PR1901MB215072B780BD902EB5E5428BFCEF0@DM5PR1901MB2150.namprd19.prod.outlook.com>
References: <CAP7zK5Y1nZL1kfyTv3pRPFZb4+9fi+awFCC9aU1FQ+POgM-KUw@mail.gmail.com> <9E9DA2A9-AED9-44D5-8E30-4E0E38EF36FD@nokia.com>
In-Reply-To: <9E9DA2A9-AED9-44D5-8E30-4E0E38EF36FD@nokia.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-Exchange-Organization-SCL: -1
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
X-MS-Exchange-Organization-RecordReviewCfmType: 0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/DyZhzxpW0claUE5Wt41XkI3_kyw>
Subject: Re: [Pce] WG adoption poll for draft-stone-pce-local-protection-enforcement-02.
X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Path Computation Element <pce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pce/>
List-Post: <mailto:pce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Nov 2020 18:14:37 -0000

I believe the issue the draft is tackling is useful and I support adoption. I also believe the idea of "enforcing" a constraint can be generalized (e.g. to other constraints). Ideally, we can consider an approach that can be extended to other constraints in future too.

Regards,
Tarek

On 10/21/20, 5:14 PM, "Pce on behalf of Stone, Andrew (Nokia - CA/Ottawa)" <pce-bounces@ietf.org on behalf of andrew.stone@nokia.com> wrote:

    Hello, 

    As co-author, I support the adoption. Document describes various use case needs, has implementations, and has been updated based on existing feedback. Would be good to have adopted to move to early IANA codepoint allocations to allow implementation to progress further, as well as further WG refinement. 

    Thank you
    Andrew

    On 2020-10-21, 9:41 AM, "Pce on behalf of Dhruv Dhody" <pce-bounces@ietf.org on behalf of dd@dhruvdhody.com> wrote:

        Hi WG,

        This email begins the WG adoption poll for
        draft-stone-pce-local-protection-enforcement-02.

        https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-stone-pce-local-protection-enforcement-02

        Should this draft be adopted by the PCE WG? Please state your reasons
        - Why / Why not? What needs to be fixed before or after adoption? Are
        you willing to work on this draft? Review comments should be posted to
        the list.

        This adoption poll will end on 9th Nov 2020 (Monday).

        Thanks!
        Dhruv & Julien

        _______________________________________________
        Pce mailing list
        Pce@ietf.org
        https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce

    _______________________________________________
    Pce mailing list
    Pce@ietf.org
    https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email