IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Pce] WG adoption poll for draft-stone-pce-local-protection-enforcement-02.

Vishnu Pavan Beeram <vishnupavan@gmail.com> Sun, 08 November 2020 12:36 UTC

Return-Path: <vishnupavan@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5FE83A0A84 for <pce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 8 Nov 2020 04:36:03 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ubITG96ylVXQ for <pce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 8 Nov 2020 04:36:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-il1-x129.google.com (mail-il1-x129.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::129]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 64C9F3A0A74 for <pce@ietf.org>; Sun, 8 Nov 2020 04:36:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-il1-x129.google.com with SMTP id e16so5821671ile.0 for <pce@ietf.org>; Sun, 08 Nov 2020 04:36:02 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=OIT9TDt4YPhlkOdXT8hdKoRCssaWSLwztGshHjjFcE4=; b=DhYgykyGLBSe3NlgW0/i0JBS1hadWwRN7hKjJ/1coCERwzKF4W8vaPsVLjBcxF4Ntm zTsnnJf/kReQSIYtar7R0A6z3XFDzkm/LFpgCiD8v1vUOk8u9pJINjNyIOLWFHZ4hN9C gcdhfW+PRbwc8f+uNYCdvNCu1lZC7M1by6tsJGGgu4rSsk8boP7yeThZbazXc+xjdXiJ dlcfJBzKG+/MeL9CWSiVpY36wTnzl/o9YqzWgAAWrItktcGG7l7Hyc7jDD2cWIm6qE8a bXN8wWBrDkcxiBo+kAQXM3TegofRAF5w0L+HMx/+BnpmkXXve2IPOTTgmghmHNfvEtA8 +raA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=OIT9TDt4YPhlkOdXT8hdKoRCssaWSLwztGshHjjFcE4=; b=TjdJKMHcOV7O9sMRf2aQTWQWHPlQEVUXmN6Uu/RgfRL8Usvk8bamv1tGktX6ltsN8z MxLXPcp52mNiafbKP5FpDeXn25ZfDk+B9paPa/YV4IrsVZWctLX4bW80n2aHSDSg62qp eeykwBelFaXNtdU6KACScZPqHLofyTxPSbw7Uqzxvl3inUoKIGqtsoST87Rw3n8HxwAd qZfX+sglSU3QTypbDyOx0SBBVT2chIw/zxWZZ05uqri4vkmOrtvcjgK0w4AmHzpF4A4b wFKQI4+PkHAbhzt6bdTDER/bPzdi3gQllw1l86+6bioG8jJOn1ZS5TIeTf4HP4ERSBfO TGQA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM53303nAUVbFCK7eOTZBIf2I7pfkcibBPPTsxIpy7+g8VvLyP4qaZ Uwmklrcz97blgrk1703Orw1EbzNXv+UswLKqvRg=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxQ2P2SLiCXlHePiBbDnRa8sP0+1boOYEBIxM/IFsSLlsWWzJ2lHKoxOeNh0xm50JQp1nponJ4+PgR7bK0hm/c=
X-Received: by 2002:a92:98cf:: with SMTP id a76mr5819155ill.179.1604838961676; Sun, 08 Nov 2020 04:36:01 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAP7zK5Y1nZL1kfyTv3pRPFZb4+9fi+awFCC9aU1FQ+POgM-KUw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAP7zK5Y1nZL1kfyTv3pRPFZb4+9fi+awFCC9aU1FQ+POgM-KUw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Vishnu Pavan Beeram <vishnupavan@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 08 Nov 2020 06:35:50 -0600
Message-ID: <CA+YzgTs3YfQiGX73BAXOP2K7Z-2uGpUB=w6nytW2ukAf+VbHJQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Dhruv Dhody <dd@dhruvdhody.com>
Cc: pce@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000003b890005b397b0b9"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/y3DNjin3OZhOXX6uoYCW-vgLYoo>
Subject: Re: [Pce] WG adoption poll for draft-stone-pce-local-protection-enforcement-02.
X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Path Computation Element <pce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pce/>
List-Post: <mailto:pce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Nov 2020 12:36:04 -0000

Support adoption! The draft addresses a hole in the existing protection
toolkit.

It would however be useful to have a generic way of requesting or mandating
each LSP/path attribute (similar to RSVP LSP/HOP attributes). I haven't
read draft-dhody-pce-stateful-pce-optional, but I'm assuming that it
doesn't cover local protection enforcement.

Regards,
-Pavan

On Wed, Oct 21, 2020 at 8:41 AM Dhruv Dhody <dd@dhruvdhody.com> wrote:

> Hi WG,
>
> This email begins the WG adoption poll for
> draft-stone-pce-local-protection-enforcement-02.
>
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-stone-pce-local-protection-enforcement-02
>
> Should this draft be adopted by the PCE WG? Please state your reasons
> - Why / Why not? What needs to be fixed before or after adoption? Are
> you willing to work on this draft? Review comments should be posted to
> the list.
>
> This adoption poll will end on 9th Nov 2020 (Monday).
>
> Thanks!
> Dhruv & Julien
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pce mailing list
> Pce@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email