IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Pce] WG adoption poll for draft-stone-pce-local-protection-enforcement-02.

Dhruv Dhody <dd@dhruvdhody.com> Sun, 08 November 2020 14:03 UTC

Return-Path: <dd@dhruvdhody.com>
X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3F993A0DAE for <pce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 8 Nov 2020 06:03:43 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=dhruvdhody-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id if7EOj6SaI8n for <pce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 8 Nov 2020 06:03:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pf1-x42b.google.com (mail-pf1-x42b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::42b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9CF8A3A0A90 for <pce@ietf.org>; Sun, 8 Nov 2020 06:03:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pf1-x42b.google.com with SMTP id a18so5322242pfl.3 for <pce@ietf.org>; Sun, 08 Nov 2020 06:03:42 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=dhruvdhody-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=YN25Wvs3thXhikbI2F0lvmeXpR/bky1X8qYZTdL3RyI=; b=nVDW/amZ2YVo0iFsPqs6jmMEdaCHCk/NBZ7Ifpf/bl1bLOOCFKm+rDR3kleXon0QzQ 5dTzqw2/tewGh5ybkGfYYitGICjqOJW7AIMepV1UZXJ0ni9yJpoue8T8IEtC9KwJPlD6 hgyVrA3FZx8J+sM0T3wlZJITlAaclXTTQ/Q4pubF9cFoIJShAC+zlRSYAVxnQfItf+xr QTL7xequXRO3MUnd7koz/ipQtM5nQrVGu7U1np+om/xUxQmIXKwE6eVm141zjTHSQ/dp XlTj6eSwfwr5WvqJmFo0FLwmHXyGg6Sew5Oo5slrCnyLIX9SbTLIl3WfCMLSdDoT47Bh wfUg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=YN25Wvs3thXhikbI2F0lvmeXpR/bky1X8qYZTdL3RyI=; b=RZhNWOPEThTrNTmEyVP66w22EuVIw3Jf8dGu0vApnZR7PrkQ5nF5QnzcQTWD4f4qyz eNbVH44OqOsNmqu5V9kIzoV0ZwfmNavo+zElQwN6Ki1uDI1wYZUJE4mkAGIoIRivD07u Bw8q7USY8xhRjEDaGkguAYdMVkVX6Q1qmz6ccMTTjS6RcnyfACUoZmJTRoFi45Z2fLfT c9gxCaqQ+lpFJHs0U3HHfpQdfmS0qDW0QRPC6f3IL35+aXqR57vV1m1lAXGfkm2w5kDB U/9i+czPLWn74KD1yALPLbuvWZdPkLpFsHhWXH9KpZX77xixXrgUsYKTo0EMKmuzb9NL UBPA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532qjimEM2YBsgIvRPnpAeScuo3B0cvYIdq+HQ6JbK+bs01KCvr4 Qz3zIUdrMOyONjiTqXXWRneJHdYQD7I057o/V9J/xw==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzZv1sPdgdMtrpqw/IBcoBs2K32VhFdmgk03kB6ur/aJv0iKu5jFEoEA9+9dzipfBHJnIf9HTw8rjyRFLa5nkQ=
X-Received: by 2002:a65:47ca:: with SMTP id f10mr8889122pgs.298.1604844222026; Sun, 08 Nov 2020 06:03:42 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAP7zK5Y1nZL1kfyTv3pRPFZb4+9fi+awFCC9aU1FQ+POgM-KUw@mail.gmail.com> <CA+YzgTs3YfQiGX73BAXOP2K7Z-2uGpUB=w6nytW2ukAf+VbHJQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CA+YzgTs3YfQiGX73BAXOP2K7Z-2uGpUB=w6nytW2ukAf+VbHJQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Dhruv Dhody <dd@dhruvdhody.com>
Date: Sun, 08 Nov 2020 19:33:05 +0530
Message-ID: <CAP7zK5b9hp5ivsJrxoPM8xD+69PoLEvP1t9ZQ1kYZHZtZYGYoA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Vishnu Pavan Beeram <vishnupavan@gmail.com>
Cc: pce@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/IeKfh7WABaQB4iI4zqH21pBvY28>
Subject: Re: [Pce] WG adoption poll for draft-stone-pce-local-protection-enforcement-02.
X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Path Computation Element <pce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pce/>
List-Post: <mailto:pce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Nov 2020 14:03:44 -0000

Hi Pavan,

Thanks for participating in the adoption call. Some clarification questions...

Could you point the WG to the right reference in RSVP-TE? Is it RFC 5420?

The Stateful-PCE-optional draft is a generic mechanism to mark whole
PCEP objects as mandatory and optional to process. You are right that
it doesn't cover local protection enforcement at the granularity of
the per-attribute in the LSPA object. Please confirm if my
understanding is correct?

Note that there is a single flag defined in the LSPA object so far, so
generalizing would help a future flag when and if it gets added. Could
you suggest what change you would make to turn this procedure generic?

Thanks!
Dhruv

On Sun, Nov 8, 2020 at 6:06 PM Vishnu Pavan Beeram
<vishnupavan@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Support adoption! The draft addresses a hole in the existing protection toolkit.
>
> It would however be useful to have a generic way of requesting or mandating each LSP/path attribute (similar to RSVP LSP/HOP attributes). I haven't read draft-dhody-pce-stateful-pce-optional, but I'm assuming that it doesn't cover local protection enforcement.
>
> Regards,
> -Pavan
>
> On Wed, Oct 21, 2020 at 8:41 AM Dhruv Dhody <dd@dhruvdhody.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi WG,
>>
>> This email begins the WG adoption poll for
>> draft-stone-pce-local-protection-enforcement-02.
>>
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-stone-pce-local-protection-enforcement-02
>>
>> Should this draft be adopted by the PCE WG? Please state your reasons
>> - Why / Why not? What needs to be fixed before or after adoption? Are
>> you willing to work on this draft? Review comments should be posted to
>> the list.
>>
>> This adoption poll will end on 9th Nov 2020 (Monday).
>>
>> Thanks!
>> Dhruv & Julien
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Pce mailing list
>> Pce@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email