IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Pce] FW: Adoption of draft-li-pce-sr-bidir-path-06?

zhuyq8@chinatelecom.cn Wed, 22 January 2020 05:55 UTC

Return-Path: <zhuyq8@chinatelecom.cn>
X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59C6A120024; Tue, 21 Jan 2020 21:55:56 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.199
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.199 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_HTML_ONLY=0.1, PDS_TONAME_EQ_TOLOCAL_HDRS_LCASE=1.999, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Tlup7CFzapr8; Tue, 21 Jan 2020 21:55:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from chinatelecom.cn (prt-mail.chinatelecom.cn [42.123.76.220]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D526A120013; Tue, 21 Jan 2020 21:55:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from clientip-120.88.10.46?logid-5987a7d1f4204302bf5aa631b0590e26 (unknown [172.18.0.92]) by chinatelecom.cn (HERMES) with SMTP id 6C0E5280084; Wed, 22 Jan 2020 13:55:49 +0800 (CST)
HMM_ATTACHE_NUM: 0000
HMM_SOURCE_IP: wmail.172.18.0.92.371799780
HMM_SOURCE_TYPE: WEBMAIL
Received: from ([172.18.0.254]) by App0021 with ESMTP id 5987a7d1f4204302bf5aa631b0590e26 for pce-bounces@ietf.org; Wed Jan 22 13:55:49 2020
X-Transaction-ID: 5987a7d1f4204302bf5aa631b0590e26
X-filter-score: filter<0>
X-Real-From: zhuyq8@chinatelecom.cn
X-Receive-IP: 172.18.0.254
X-MEDUSA-Status: 0
Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2020 13:55:48 +0800
From: zhuyq8@chinatelecom.cn
To: pce-bounces <pce-bounces@ietf.org>
Cc: pce <pce@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <937435771.138363.1579672549762@App0043>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----=_Part_138362_468374126.1579672548608"
HMM_WEBCLN_IP: 172.18.0.176
X-HERMES-SENDMODE: normal
X-HERMES-SET: tKSovLfYPg2Q7jEAESng/Bb49PknL3W+NiWCQSA9evQ=
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/4oA8YrT9sdoHc2sKlTBc0cAh6fQ>
Subject: Re: [Pce] FW: Adoption of draft-li-pce-sr-bidir-path-06?
X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Path Computation Element <pce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pce/>
List-Post: <mailto:pce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2020 05:55:56 -0000

 
 
 
 

Support.

Thanks.

Zhu Yongqing

-----Original Message-----
From: Pce [mailto:pce-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of julien.meuric@orange.com
Sent: Friday, January 17, 2020 6:13 PM
To: pce@ietf.org
Subject: [Pce] Adoption of draft-li-pce-sr-bidir-path-06?

Hi all,

It is time to share your thoughts about draft-li-pce-sr-bidir-path-06.
Do you believe the I-D is a right foundation for a PCE WG item? Please use the PCE mailing list to express your comments, support or disagreement, including applicable rationale, especially for the latter.

Thanks,

Dhruv & Julien



v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email