IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Pce] Status of draft-ietf-pce-pce-initiated-lsp

"Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk> Tue, 03 May 2016 19:16 UTC

Return-Path: <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4843912D0FC; Tue, 3 May 2016 12:16:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.619
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.619 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SLsOtv4ubPKG; Tue, 3 May 2016 12:16:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from asmtp1.iomartmail.com (asmtp1.iomartmail.com [62.128.201.248]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C73AD12D105; Tue, 3 May 2016 12:16:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from asmtp1.iomartmail.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by asmtp1.iomartmail.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id u43JGZkw023764; Tue, 3 May 2016 20:16:35 +0100
Received: from 950129200 (jplon-nat11.juniper.net [193.110.55.11]) (authenticated bits=0) by asmtp1.iomartmail.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id u43JGWCB023749 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 3 May 2016 20:16:33 +0100
From: Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
To: 'Ina Minei' <inaminei@google.com>
References: <044701d19f97$fdd7a020$f986e060$@olddog.co.uk> <CAG4Q_av-0-DJJ6rwifA2iR=Y1cAkWUgkV5_x8vbrDFrqRymmOg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAG4Q_av-0-DJJ6rwifA2iR=Y1cAkWUgkV5_x8vbrDFrqRymmOg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 03 May 2016 20:16:31 +0100
Message-ID: <053b01d1a570$4d9f9800$e8dec800$@olddog.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_053C_01D1A578.AF670D40"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AQFkNvAvNKk5tByDbQgkIqVy1HfgTwKvfPmnoGz14sA=
Content-Language: en-gb
X-TM-AS-MML: disable
X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: IMSS-7.1.0.1679-8.0.0.1202-22300.001
X-TM-AS-Result: No--32.467-10.0-31-10
X-imss-scan-details: No--32.467-10.0-31-10
X-TMASE-MatchedRID: Xxz90/Ib/ZhbJCKOm3VRCSO+zHlY4YEc0u5faGP8ztSz0xxc4lfzUk0K Ol/ikBEKcfRJq1ctTfyL9v4vFTanjiH8kDR0dp2m5RW8tolFjJlyzgDzQppqQN0tLMo3MVOuefC 0tlaz8X+Lx/YQpRkIWIlD2T5imTkJiweLE0aTpwlVW5LVJV/so6PijnysRC6C/lu6AQkBIuVMTu UJyZmqIb70ajgGAU9muIwLnB3Aqp0ZKp0SZ4P+dQ2G3vz8l/IEqODwu+49pCVrdJfNApO069r5i k/JLp/YYqmUd3tOErVjoaO27r+3fcBZPOJYZoM8nSPw4pGdVDw396IxHt8iBafXglcIpmguBaB5 /ULQv55HW+94FA8JF0K9qlwiTElfrogFtKd/P7e638ZUY6gSd4AuOqciU0p01eMp+in9a9PfCoL 1Cy7eF/36sqVF/VZoS3OTftLNfg2U9XpVqqLhsPHFoBcOsKeziPsnePM42N0lrqsYlHhF+jC6IP NP8UWJUeL68LoXEvwFTi5T7nLXai3S35ohUu37krNbLf4aYG5czilUefYvAz+ZqQbT6/3u3rf2h EEVSR5DSkUa9i2161gowyUWHgGdAS/18zRRZh8UtdRZTmEaIV2pa+aJMbya//nkqRz73/pz3XEx g2oeRelGKMkRBXaMQesjq8XPMbuXYX34rFl3x+eU0qFv58B+lSBIvH74wfJrar1QOTCmjzl5+IQ AcYVk8lEDYmoBkrPbH8WaUL9qjB2CTNIhL2HPmCNknSXswf8SkGdmQt+XWWXljhnB0lbauh/tM+ km/DyjbvDx57hYLzTR2TFg0xG31ViV5EWK7TubKItl61J/yZUdXE/WGn0FSlnU38LCY8sD2+der WHxdRCpz+Mn9+RrUvNl5jRuSCvHZNS0Ts1tJLtA4SJYqvzn5ClD8PTpSOM=
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/6gv9Yzy5wenk8bszrn18AXDJ3ko>
Cc: draft-ietf-pce-pce-initiated-lsp@ietf.org, 'pce' <pce@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Pce] Status of draft-ietf-pce-pce-initiated-lsp
X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
Reply-To: adrian@olddog.co.uk
List-Id: Path Computation Element <pce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pce/>
List-Post: <mailto:pce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 May 2016 19:16:42 -0000

Hi Ina,
 
Great that you have this under control.
 
Looks like "review and review" are the actions on me.
Will do.
 
Cheers,
Adrian
 
From: Ina Minei [mailto:inaminei@google.com] 
Sent: 02 May 2016 17:17
To: 'Adrian Farrel' (adrian@olddog.co.uk)
Cc: pce; draft-ietf-pce-pce-initiated-lsp@ietf.org
Subject: Re: Status of draft-ietf-pce-pce-initiated-lsp
 
Adrian, 
 
Thank you for bringing this up. I will repost the initiation draft, I am aware that it expired. Before doing so, will reply to what I think is the unfinished thread (  <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/wn4gGwZnTZS53pbyg1eCHw3YMVE> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/wn4gGwZnTZS53pbyg1eCHw3YMVE) , please let me know if there was a different thread that you are referring to. Thank you for bringing this up, this had completely fallen through the cracks on my end. 
 
Thank you for your offer to help with the stateful PCE I-D. Your help would be appreciated in letting us know if there are pending changes needed, as I 
am assuming that the version posted a month ago addressed all issues, want to make sure this is not a similar situation as the initiation draft. 
 
Thank you, 
 
Ina 
 
 
On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 1:45 AM, Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk> wrote:
Hi All,

In Buenos Aires Jon presented the WG status (thanks) and showed that
draft-ietf-pce-pce-initiated-lsp is "Pending shepherd review".

Just looking now (because quite a lot of new work seems to depend on the
PCInitiate message) I see that:

- The I-D expired a couple of days ago (April 21, 2016)

- The last discussion on the list was an email from Julien suggesting that
   some work was needed to address open questions on the list.

I'd like to see this I-D move forward now (as well as the stateful PCE I-D!).
Can I offer my assistance to the authors in any way? I am willing to shovel
shit, or just make editorial changes.

Let's dig the WG out of the treacle and start to be relevant again :-)

Thanks,
Adrian

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email