IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Pce] Status of draft-ietf-pce-pce-initiated-lsp

"Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk> Tue, 26 April 2016 10:03 UTC

Return-Path: <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A06FB12B059; Tue, 26 Apr 2016 03:03:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.08
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.08 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eHH7ZBmgarTY; Tue, 26 Apr 2016 03:03:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from asmtp4.iomartmail.com (asmtp4.iomartmail.com [62.128.201.175]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B711612B02D; Tue, 26 Apr 2016 03:03:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from asmtp4.iomartmail.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by asmtp4.iomartmail.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id u3Q8jWaQ026901; Tue, 26 Apr 2016 09:45:32 +0100
Received: from 950129200 (host81-132-11-66.range81-132.btcentralplus.com [81.132.11.66]) (authenticated bits=0) by asmtp4.iomartmail.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id u3Q8jVLC026880 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 26 Apr 2016 09:45:31 +0100
From: Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
To: pce@ietf.org
Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2016 09:45:29 +0100
Message-ID: <044701d19f97$fdd7a020$f986e060$@olddog.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AdGfl/IXfHCwv0QYTXChRJusYHyfuw==
Content-Language: en-gb
X-TM-AS-MML: disable
X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: IMSS-7.1.0.1679-8.0.0.1202-22284.005
X-TM-AS-Result: No--9.124-10.0-31-10
X-imss-scan-details: No--9.124-10.0-31-10
X-TMASE-MatchedRID: pW3hMi3QyQWPLG+A0qvEpqZCFtxq3n99wx0jRRxcQfPjsTquy0JRi3Zr uQG5/1P7iSQjy3ULNtsBdNsOEWLr3KHNozT622Z4ytPf0+gM21bomPrNi98UBEklF5L0lQHcrUP UnGU6bCmRmo7DNbFS0RiGo50W+5Ps2X53LeVAc3GfNCkqvupbSDKj2E7bj9fF/UpRtwF/GJqjxY yRBa/qJX3mXSdV7KK4FAX4EtUi0PgLbigRnpKlKSPzRlrdFGDwSWa+ZqQS2tTo8D4CWlKcyf1qC KyftkhDoLUpmeXbewqMnP6vzc8nqg==
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/oq6xt-yQFhDYkFHKVaqaNdT4uK0>
Cc: draft-ietf-pce-pce-initiated-lsp@ietf.org
Subject: [Pce] Status of draft-ietf-pce-pce-initiated-lsp
X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
Reply-To: adrian@olddog.co.uk
List-Id: Path Computation Element <pce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pce/>
List-Post: <mailto:pce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2016 10:03:29 -0000

Hi All,

In Buenos Aires Jon presented the WG status (thanks) and showed that
draft-ietf-pce-pce-initiated-lsp is "Pending shepherd review".

Just looking now (because quite a lot of new work seems to depend on the
PCInitiate message) I see that:

- The I-D expired a couple of days ago (April 21, 2016)

- The last discussion on the list was an email from Julien suggesting that
   some work was needed to address open questions on the list.

I'd like to see this I-D move forward now (as well as the stateful PCE I-D!).
Can I offer my assistance to the authors in any way? I am willing to shovel
shit, or just make editorial changes.

Let's dig the WG out of the treacle and start to be relevant again :-)

Thanks,
Adrian

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email