Re: [Pce] Status of draft-ietf-pce-pce-initiated-lsp

[Ina Minei <[e-mail]>]

Adrian,

Thank you for bringing this up. I will repost the initiation draft, I am
aware that it expired. Before doing so, will reply to what I think is the
unfinished thread (
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/wn4gGwZnTZS53pbyg1eCHw3YMVE) ,
please let me know if there was a different thread that you are referring
to. Thank you for bringing this up, this had completely fallen through the
cracks on my end.

Thank you for your offer to help with the stateful PCE I-D. Your help would
be appreciated in letting us know if there are pending changes needed, as I
am assuming that the version posted a month ago addressed all issues, want
to make sure this is not a similar situation as the initiation draft.

Thank you,

Ina


On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 1:45 AM, Adrian Farrel <[e-mail]> wrote:

> Hi All,
>
> In Buenos Aires Jon presented the WG status (thanks) and showed that
> draft-ietf-pce-pce-initiated-lsp is "Pending shepherd review".
>
> Just looking now (because quite a lot of new work seems to depend on the
> PCInitiate message) I see that:
>
> - The I-D expired a couple of days ago (April 21, 2016)
>
> - The last discussion on the list was an email from Julien suggesting that
>    some work was needed to address open questions on the list.
>
> I'd like to see this I-D move forward now (as well as the stateful PCE
> I-D!).
> Can I offer my assistance to the authors in any way? I am willing to shovel
> shit, or just make editorial changes.
>
> Let's dig the WG out of the treacle and start to be relevant again :-)
>
> Thanks,
> Adrian
>
>