IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Pce] Status of draft-ietf-pce-pce-initiated-lsp

Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu> Wed, 27 April 2016 02:40 UTC

Return-Path: <loa@pi.nu>
X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E445A12B077; Tue, 26 Apr 2016 19:40:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.896
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.896 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.996] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id U65w4EUitHP5; Tue, 26 Apr 2016 19:40:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pipi.pi.nu (pipi.pi.nu [83.168.239.141]) (using TLSv1.1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B698112D13B; Tue, 26 Apr 2016 19:40:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.6] (unknown [122.53.41.246]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: loa@pi.nu) by pipi.pi.nu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 874BB18013CB; Wed, 27 Apr 2016 04:40:41 +0200 (CEST)
To: adrian@olddog.co.uk, pce@ietf.org
References: <044701d19f97$fdd7a020$f986e060$@olddog.co.uk>
From: Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu>
Message-ID: <57202690.7060107@pi.nu>
Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2016 10:40:16 +0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.7.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <044701d19f97$fdd7a020$f986e060$@olddog.co.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/uqdoK-gQit7oAPMnOVphD721s0Y>
Cc: draft-ietf-pce-pce-initiated-lsp@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Pce] Status of draft-ietf-pce-pce-initiated-lsp
X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Path Computation Element <pce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pce/>
List-Post: <mailto:pce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2016 02:40:47 -0000

Working Group, et.al.,

I agree with Adrian, let me know if I can help, at least I can review
if you want to have another review before wglc.

/Loa

On 2016-04-26 16:45, Adrian Farrel wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> In Buenos Aires Jon presented the WG status (thanks) and showed that
> draft-ietf-pce-pce-initiated-lsp is "Pending shepherd review".
>
> Just looking now (because quite a lot of new work seems to depend on the
> PCInitiate message) I see that:
>
> - The I-D expired a couple of days ago (April 21, 2016)
>
> - The last discussion on the list was an email from Julien suggesting that
>     some work was needed to address open questions on the list.
>
> I'd like to see this I-D move forward now (as well as the stateful PCE I-D!).
> Can I offer my assistance to the authors in any way? I am willing to shovel
> shit, or just make editorial changes.
>
> Let's dig the WG out of the treacle and start to be relevant again :-)
>
> Thanks,
> Adrian
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pce mailing list
> Pce@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email