IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Pce] Fwd: Adoption of two new Working Documents ?

JP Vasseur <jvasseur@cisco.com> Mon, 02 March 2009 07:54 UTC

Return-Path: <jvasseur@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: pce@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pce@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46A493A6BB3 for <pce@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 1 Mar 2009 23:54:38 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.523
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.523 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.075, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hmAWvXW71BTP for <pce@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 1 Mar 2009 23:54:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ams-iport-1.cisco.com (ams-iport-1.cisco.com [144.254.224.140]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D75A73A6B52 for <pce@ietf.org>; Sun, 1 Mar 2009 23:54:36 -0800 (PST)
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos; i="4.38,288,1233532800"; d="scan'208,217"; a="35137125"
Received: from ams-dkim-1.cisco.com ([144.254.224.138]) by ams-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 02 Mar 2009 07:54:59 +0000
Received: from ams-core-1.cisco.com (ams-core-1.cisco.com [144.254.224.150]) by ams-dkim-1.cisco.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id n227sxQ3023436 for <pce@ietf.org>; Mon, 2 Mar 2009 08:54:59 +0100
Received: from xbh-ams-331.emea.cisco.com (xbh-ams-331.cisco.com [144.254.231.71]) by ams-core-1.cisco.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n227sxG7005949 for <pce@ietf.org>; Mon, 2 Mar 2009 07:54:59 GMT
Received: from xfe-ams-331.emea.cisco.com ([144.254.231.72]) by xbh-ams-331.emea.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Mon, 2 Mar 2009 08:54:59 +0100
Received: from ams-jvasseur-8711.cisco.com ([10.55.201.130]) by xfe-ams-331.emea.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Mon, 2 Mar 2009 08:54:59 +0100
Message-Id: <34BF2ED9-0C53-4009-B00B-5A44DDBD53B0@cisco.com>
From: JP Vasseur <jvasseur@cisco.com>
To: pce@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail-131--24738979"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v930.3)
Date: Mon, 02 Mar 2009 08:54:58 +0100
References: <CE9D6E48-BAAE-4414-9A96-CBE4A5578617@cisco.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.930.3)
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 02 Mar 2009 07:54:59.0267 (UTC) FILETIME=[2F534930:01C99B0C]
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; l=5886; t=1235980499; x=1236844499; c=relaxed/simple; s=amsdkim1002; h=Content-Type:From:Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; d=cisco.com; i=jvasseur@cisco.com; z=From:=20JP=20Vasseur=20<jvasseur@cisco.com> |Subject:=20Fwd=3A=20[Pce]=20Adoption=20of=20two=20new=20Wo rking=20Documents=20? |Sender:=20; bh=03PUz2BYgiD+SyqJO7r2hg7BEEBDv6MWYzNqORiOock=; b=AhwRMWXS2dUOUkw7OXvLV+JEfK9TK1/CFBYxXUJo+1QatCDWF6vQSr6KPP fb3Dtm/uTblCfwlm5qRq9rftxaUnqlbqvsMn00qlQ/8wQaGyqay1qmJqzehu FmhqqwwMuz;
Authentication-Results: ams-dkim-1; header.From=jvasseur@cisco.com; dkim=pass ( sig from cisco.com/amsdkim1002 verified; );
Subject: [Pce] Fwd: Adoption of two new Working Documents ?
X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Path Computation Element <pce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/pce>
List-Post: <mailto:pce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Mar 2009 07:54:38 -0000

Dear all,

I would like to poll the WG again on the adoption of draft-farrel-pce- 
vendor-constraints-02.txt as a WG document ? We had very reply to the  
first poll in November.

Thanks.

JP.

Begin forwarded message:

> From: JP Vasseur <jvasseur@cisco.com>
> Date: November 19, 2008 12:04:48 PM CEST
> To: pce@ietf.org
> Subject: [Pce] Adoption of two new Working Documents ?
>
> Dear WG,
>
> Are you in favor or opposed to the adoption of the two following  
> documents as PCE WG documents ?
>
> draft-farrel-pce-vendor-constraints-02.txt
> draft-kkoushik-pce-pcep-mib-02.txt
> Thanks.
>
> JP.
> _______________________________________________
> Pce mailing list
> Pce@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email