IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Pce] Fwd: Adoption of two new Working Documents ?

Tomonori TAKEDA <takeda.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp> Tue, 03 March 2009 12:08 UTC

Return-Path: <takeda.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp>
X-Original-To: pce@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pce@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A12D73A69BA for <pce@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 Mar 2009 04:08:41 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 2.067
X-Spam-Level: **
X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.067 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.257, BAYES_40=-0.185, HELO_EQ_JP=1.244, HOST_EQ_JP=1.265]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id P5P5-bn9ahSd for <pce@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 Mar 2009 04:08:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from tama50.ecl.ntt.co.jp (tama50.ecl.ntt.co.jp [129.60.39.147]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D7CA3A6C42 for <pce@ietf.org>; Tue, 3 Mar 2009 04:08:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mfs5.rdh.ecl.ntt.co.jp (mfs5.rdh.ecl.ntt.co.jp [129.60.39.144]) by tama50.ecl.ntt.co.jp (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id n23C8kW8011370 for <pce@ietf.org>; Tue, 3 Mar 2009 21:08:46 +0900 (JST)
Received: from mfs5.rdh.ecl.ntt.co.jp (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mfs5.rdh.ecl.ntt.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4930F63E9 for <pce@ietf.org>; Tue, 3 Mar 2009 21:08:46 +0900 (JST)
Received: from imf.m.ecl.ntt.co.jp (imf0.m.ecl.ntt.co.jp [129.60.5.144]) by mfs5.rdh.ecl.ntt.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42D116383 for <pce@ietf.org>; Tue, 3 Mar 2009 21:08:46 +0900 (JST)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] ([129.60.80.55]) by imf.m.ecl.ntt.co.jp (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n23C8iwY006854 for <pce@ietf.org>; Tue, 3 Mar 2009 21:08:46 +0900 (JST)
Message-ID: <49AD1D9B.7010500@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Date: Tue, 03 Mar 2009 21:07:55 +0900
From: Tomonori TAKEDA <takeda.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Windows/20071031)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: pce@ietf.org
References: <CE9D6E48-BAAE-4414-9A96-CBE4A5578617@cisco.com> <34BF2ED9-0C53-4009-B00B-5A44DDBD53B0@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <34BF2ED9-0C53-4009-B00B-5A44DDBD53B0@cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-2022-JP"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [Pce] Fwd: Adoption of two new Working Documents ?
X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Path Computation Element <pce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/pce>
List-Post: <mailto:pce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Mar 2009 12:08:41 -0000

Yes.

Tomonori

JP Vasseur wrote:
> Dear all,
> 
> I would like to poll the WG again on the adoption of 
> draft-farrel-pce-vendor-constraints-02.txt as a WG document ? We had 
> very reply to the first poll in November.
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> JP.
> 
> Begin forwarded message:
> 
>> From: JP Vasseur <jvasseur@cisco.com>
>> Date: November 19, 2008 12:04:48 PM CEST
>> To: pce@ietf.org
>> Subject: [Pce] Adoption of two new Working Documents ?
>>
>> Dear WG,
>>
>> Are you in favor or opposed to the adoption of the two following 
>> documents as PCE WG documents ?
>>
>> draft-farrel-pce-vendor-constraints-02.txt
>> draft-kkoushik-pce-pcep-mib-02.txt
>> Thanks.
>>
>> JP.
>> _______________________________________________
>> Pce mailing list
>> Pce@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Pce mailing list
> Pce@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email