IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Pce] Fwd: Adoption of two new Working Documents ?

"Itaru Nishioka" <i-nishioka@cb.jp.nec.com> Fri, 06 March 2009 16:20 UTC

Return-Path: <i-nishioka@cb.jp.nec.com>
X-Original-To: pce@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pce@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77B533A6CBE for <pce@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 6 Mar 2009 08:20:00 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.09
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.09 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_JP=1.244, HOST_EQ_JP=1.265]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oB2e+jGrrY0y for <pce@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 6 Mar 2009 08:19:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: from tyo202.gate.nec.co.jp (TYO202.gate.nec.co.jp [202.32.8.206]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 172F43A6784 for <pce@ietf.org>; Fri, 6 Mar 2009 08:19:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mailgate3.nec.co.jp ([10.7.69.161]) by tyo202.gate.nec.co.jp (8.13.8/8.13.4) with ESMTP id n26GKNhD018107; Sat, 7 Mar 2009 01:20:23 +0900 (JST)
Received: (from root@localhost) by mailgate3.nec.co.jp (8.11.7/3.7W-MAILGATE-NEC) id n26GKNP02258; Sat, 7 Mar 2009 01:20:23 +0900 (JST)
Received: from mail02.kamome.nec.co.jp (mail02.kamome.nec.co.jp [10.25.43.5]) by mailsv3.nec.co.jp (8.13.8/8.13.4) with ESMTP id n26GKMUt001964; Sat, 7 Mar 2009 01:20:22 +0900 (JST)
Received: from shoin.jp.nec.com ([10.26.220.3] [10.26.220.3]) by mail02.kamome.nec.co.jp with ESMTP id BT-MMP-844109; Sat, 7 Mar 2009 01:20:06 +0900
Received: from C08AUG00201 ([10.56.131.165] [10.56.131.165]) by mail.jp.nec.com with ESMTP; Sat, 7 Mar 2009 01:20:05 +0900
From: Itaru Nishioka <i-nishioka@cb.jp.nec.com>
To: 'JP Vasseur' <jvasseur@cisco.com>, pce@ietf.org
References: <CE9D6E48-BAAE-4414-9A96-CBE4A5578617@cisco.com> <34BF2ED9-0C53-4009-B00B-5A44DDBD53B0@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <34BF2ED9-0C53-4009-B00B-5A44DDBD53B0@cisco.com>
Date: Sat, 07 Mar 2009 01:20:00 +0900
Organization: NEC
Message-ID: <0652DA592B5B482182D27F959D94FEF7@nsl.ad.nec.co.jp>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.0.6001.18000
Thread-Index: AcmbDELVVTJHnxyxSAOHMNAG/tqQ7ADawjIA
Subject: Re: [Pce] Fwd: Adoption of two new Working Documents ?
X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: i-nishioka@cb.jp.nec.com
List-Id: Path Computation Element <pce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/pce>
List-Post: <mailto:pce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Mar 2009 16:20:00 -0000

 
 I support.

Regards,

== Itaru Nishioka, 



 


________________________________

	From: pce-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:pce-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of JP Vasseur
	Sent: Monday, March 02, 2009 4:55 PM
	To: pce@ietf.org
	Subject: [Pce] Fwd: Adoption of two new Working Documents ?
	
	
	Dear all, 

	I would like to poll the WG again on the adoption of
draft-farrel-pce-vendor-constraints-02.txt as a WG document ? We had very reply to the first poll in
November.
	
	
	Thanks.
	
	
	JP.
	

	Begin forwarded message:


		From: JP Vasseur <jvasseur@cisco.com>
		Date: November 19, 2008 12:04:48 PM CEST
		To: pce@ietf.org
		Subject: [Pce] Adoption of two new Working Documents ?

		Dear WG, 
		
		
		Are you in favor or opposed to the adoption of the two following documents as PCE WG
documents ?
		
		
		draft-farrel-pce-vendor-constraints-02.txt
				draft-kkoushik-pce-pcep-mib-02.txt
				Thanks.
		
		
		JP.
				_______________________________________________
		Pce mailing list
		Pce@ietf.org
		https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email