IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Pce] Fwd: Adoption of two new Working Documents ?

Greg Bernstein <gregb@grotto-networking.com> Mon, 02 March 2009 16:03 UTC

Return-Path: <gregb@grotto-networking.com>
X-Original-To: pce@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pce@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7EA223A6902 for <pce@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 2 Mar 2009 08:03:17 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jWFfOxJZgfnT for <pce@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 2 Mar 2009 08:03:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: from pro46.abac.com (pro46.abac.com [66.226.64.47]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B159B3A6887 for <pce@ietf.org>; Mon, 2 Mar 2009 08:03:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.0.131] (c-71-202-41-42.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [71.202.41.42]) (authenticated bits=0) by pro46.abac.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n22G3c0r074843 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 2 Mar 2009 08:03:39 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gregb@grotto-networking.com)
Message-ID: <49AC035A.4000909@grotto-networking.com>
Date: Mon, 02 Mar 2009 08:03:38 -0800
From: Greg Bernstein <gregb@grotto-networking.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (Windows/20081209)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: JP Vasseur <jvasseur@cisco.com>
References: <CE9D6E48-BAAE-4414-9A96-CBE4A5578617@cisco.com> <34BF2ED9-0C53-4009-B00B-5A44DDBD53B0@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <34BF2ED9-0C53-4009-B00B-5A44DDBD53B0@cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: pce@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Pce] Fwd: Adoption of two new Working Documents ?
X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Path Computation Element <pce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/pce>
List-Post: <mailto:pce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Mar 2009 16:03:17 -0000

Agree. (I'm a co-author)

Greg B.

JP Vasseur wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> I would like to poll the WG again on the adoption 
> of draft-farrel-pce-vendor-constraints-02.txt as a WG document ? We 
> had very reply to the first poll in November.
>
> Thanks.
>
> JP.
>
> Begin forwarded message:
>
>> *From: *JP Vasseur <jvasseur@cisco.com <mailto:jvasseur@cisco.com>>
>> *Date: *November 19, 2008 12:04:48 PM CEST
>> *To: *pce@ietf.org <mailto:pce@ietf.org>
>> *Subject: **[Pce] Adoption of two new Working Documents ?*
>>
>> Dear WG,
>>
>> Are you in favor or opposed to the adoption of the two following 
>> documents as PCE WG documents ?
>>
>> draft-farrel-pce-vendor-constraints-02.txt
>> draft-kkoushik-pce-pcep-mib-02.txt
>> Thanks.
>>
>> JP.
>> _______________________________________________
>> Pce mailing list
>> Pce@ietf.org <mailto:Pce@ietf.org>
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pce mailing list
> Pce@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
>   

-- 
===================================================
Dr Greg Bernstein, Grotto Networking (510) 573-2237

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email