Re: [Pce] draft-leroux-pce-of-00.txt

JP Vasseur wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mar 6, 2007, at 8:18 PM, Wenhu Lu wrote:
>
>> Hi Jean-Louis,
>>
>> It came to my attention that the acronym PCEP was used throughout 
>> this draft
>> whereas the acronym PCECP was used in drafts such as this one -
>>
>> _PCE Communication Protocol (PCECP) Specific Requirements for 
>> Inter-Area Multi Protocol Label Switching (MPLS) and Generalized MPLS 
>> (GMPLS) Traffic Engineering 
>> <http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-pce-pcecp-interarea-reqs-05.txt> 
>> (26301 bytes)._
>>
>> Are these two acronyms going to converge at some time?
>>
>
> The term PCECP is used in the requirement drafts because they refer to 
> requirements for *a* PCE Communication Protocol: PCEP is the protocol 
> that has been defined.
>
> Hope this clarifies.
Thank you JP, point taken.
I'm a little bit concerned about the symmetries of PCED and PCEP.
It's not as easy in relating "Communication" to PCEP as "Discovery" to PCED.
Maybe I missed something.

Regards,
-wenhu
>
> JP. 
>
>> Regards,
>> -wenhu
>>
>>
>>
>> LE ROUX Jean-Louis RD-CORE-LAN wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> This new draft defines PCED and PCEP extensions for the encoding of 
>>> objective functions.
>>> We are waiting for WG feedback/comments.
>>>
>>> _http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-leroux-pce-of-00.txt_
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> JL
>>>
>>>
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Pce mailing list
>>> Pce@lists.ietf.org <mailto:Pce@lists.ietf.org>
>>> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
>>>
>>>   
>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Pce mailing list
>> Pce@lists.ietf.org <mailto:Pce@lists.ietf.org>
>> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
>


_______________________________________________
Pce mailing list
Pce@lists.ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce