Re: [Pce] draft-leroux-pce-of-00.txt

Wenhu Lu <luw@redback.com> Wed, 07 March 2007 09:07 UTC

Return-path: <pce-bounces@lists.ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HOs7d-0003m0-Qu; Wed, 07 Mar 2007 04:07:45 -0500
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HOknq-0005sW-Ac for pce@ietf.org; Tue, 06 Mar 2007 20:18:50 -0500
Received: from prattle.redback.com ([155.53.12.9]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HOknp-0006Je-1L for pce@ietf.org; Tue, 06 Mar 2007 20:18:50 -0500
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by prattle.redback.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50B7247DDEF for <pce@ietf.org>; Tue, 6 Mar 2007 17:18:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from prattle.redback.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (prattle [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 09358-07 for <pce@ietf.org>; Tue, 6 Mar 2007 17:18:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [155.53.44.200] (malaga.redback.com [155.53.44.200]) by prattle.redback.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B8E047DDEB for <pce@ietf.org>; Tue, 6 Mar 2007 17:18:48 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <45EE12F8.9040902@redback.com>
Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2007 17:18:48 -0800
From: Wenhu Lu <luw@redback.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (X11/20061206)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: pce@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Pce] draft-leroux-pce-of-00.txt
References: <D109C8C97C15294495117745780657AE071BB0F7@ftrdmel1.rd.francetelecom.fr>
In-Reply-To: <D109C8C97C15294495117745780657AE071BB0F7@ftrdmel1.rd.francetelecom.fr>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at redback.com
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: e1e48a527f609d1be2bc8d8a70eb76cb
Cc:
X-BeenThere: pce@lists.ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Path Computation Element <pce.lists.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@lists.ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/pce>
List-Post: <mailto:pce@lists.ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pce-request@lists.ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@lists.ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: pce-bounces@lists.ietf.org

Hi Jean-Louis,

It came to my attention that the acronym PCEP was used throughout this draft
whereas the acronym PCECP was used in drafts such as this one -

_PCE Communication Protocol (PCECP) Specific Requirements for Inter-Area 
Multi Protocol Label Switching (MPLS) and Generalized MPLS (GMPLS) 
Traffic Engineering 
<http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-pce-pcecp-interarea-reqs-05.txt> 
(26301 bytes)._

Are these two acronyms going to converge at some time?

Regards,
-wenhu



LE ROUX Jean-Louis RD-CORE-LAN wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> This new draft defines PCED and PCEP extensions for the encoding of 
> objective functions.
> We are waiting for WG feedback/comments.
>
> _http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-leroux-pce-of-00.txt_
>
> Regards,
>
> JL
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pce mailing list
> Pce@lists.ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
>   


_______________________________________________
Pce mailing list
Pce@lists.ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce