Re: [Pce] Adoption of draft-li-pce-sr-path-segment?

Mach Chen <mach.chen@huawei.com> Tue, 08 October 2019 08:26 UTC

Return-Path: <mach.chen@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E08141200D5 for <pce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 8 Oct 2019 01:26:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id T9FdKGkozmgQ for <pce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 8 Oct 2019 01:26:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [185.176.76.210]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D6D5712006B for <pce@ietf.org>; Tue, 8 Oct 2019 01:26:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lhreml706-cah.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.7.107]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id AB1C017CFD0CA33AEA17 for <pce@ietf.org>; Tue, 8 Oct 2019 09:26:42 +0100 (IST)
Received: from lhreml712-chm.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.63) by lhreml706-cah.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.47) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.408.0; Tue, 8 Oct 2019 09:26:42 +0100
Received: from lhreml712-chm.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.63) by lhreml712-chm.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.63) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.1713.5; Tue, 8 Oct 2019 09:26:42 +0100
Received: from DGGEML403-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.3.17.33) by lhreml712-chm.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.63) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_0, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA) id 15.1.1713.5 via Frontend Transport; Tue, 8 Oct 2019 09:26:42 +0100
Received: from DGGEML510-MBX.china.huawei.com ([169.254.2.252]) by DGGEML403-HUB.china.huawei.com ([fe80::74d9:c659:fbec:21fa%31]) with mapi id 14.03.0439.000; Tue, 8 Oct 2019 16:26:39 +0800
From: Mach Chen <mach.chen@huawei.com>
To: "julien.meuric@orange.com" <julien.meuric@orange.com>, "pce@ietf.org" <pce@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Pce] Adoption of draft-li-pce-sr-path-segment?
Thread-Index: AQHVc71hRTMW7p4Lykul0a9MPjbykKdQfExw
Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2019 08:26:39 +0000
Message-ID: <F73A3CB31E8BE34FA1BBE3C8F0CB2AE296B267B9@dggeml510-mbx.china.huawei.com>
References: <29713_1569428443_5D8B93DB_29713_96_1_6698a3d9-4ace-57fd-3b7c-7be23f135631@orange.com>
In-Reply-To: <29713_1569428443_5D8B93DB_29713_96_1_6698a3d9-4ace-57fd-3b7c-7be23f135631@orange.com>
Accept-Language: en-US, zh-CN
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.199.201.210]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/H_oVJ9ynuxxY2ULwh404Q09_3A4>
Subject: Re: [Pce] Adoption of draft-li-pce-sr-path-segment?
X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Path Computation Element <pce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pce/>
List-Post: <mailto:pce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Oct 2019 08:26:47 -0000

Hi,

Support (as co-author) the adoption!

Best regards,
Mach

-----Original Message-----
From: Pce [mailto:pce-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of julien.meuric@orange.com
Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2019 12:21 AM
To: pce@ietf.org
Subject: [Pce] Adoption of draft-li-pce-sr-path-segment?

Hi PCE WG,

In our adoption poll queue, draft-li-pce-sr-path-segment has been there for a little while, after it was discussed face to face. We would now like you to voice your opinion on the list: do you think this I-D can be the foundation for a PCE WG's work item?

Please send your feedback to the PCE mailing list, including any comment you would like to share, especially if you think the WG should not adopt it. This poll will end on October 9.

Thanks,

Dhruv & Julien


_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci.

This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law; they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments.
As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified.
Thank you.

_______________________________________________
Pce mailing list
Pce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce