IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Pce] Adoption of draft-li-pce-sr-path-segment?

<xiong.quan@zte.com.cn> Tue, 08 October 2019 02:06 UTC

Return-Path: <xiong.quan@zte.com.cn>
X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 470B11200CE for <pce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 7 Oct 2019 19:06:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.197
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.197 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gq6aowhJazJF for <pce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 7 Oct 2019 19:06:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mxhk.zte.com.cn (mxhk.zte.com.cn [63.217.80.70]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 356CB120019 for <pce@ietf.org>; Mon, 7 Oct 2019 19:06:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mse-fl2.zte.com.cn (unknown [10.30.14.239]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTPS id C18D65FF6057D150E36B; Tue, 8 Oct 2019 10:06:17 +0800 (CST)
Received: from njxapp04.zte.com.cn ([10.41.132.203]) by mse-fl2.zte.com.cn with SMTP id x9825wL0075489; Tue, 8 Oct 2019 10:05:58 +0800 (GMT-8) (envelope-from xiong.quan@zte.com.cn)
Received: from mapi (njxapp05[null]) by mapi (Zmail) with MAPI id mid201; Tue, 8 Oct 2019 10:05:57 +0800 (CST)
Date: Tue, 08 Oct 2019 10:05:57 +0800
X-Zmail-TransId: 2afd5d9bef058bc8dab4
X-Mailer: Zmail v1.0
Message-ID: <201910081005579661532@zte.com.cn>
Mime-Version: 1.0
From: xiong.quan@zte.com.cn
To: julien.meuric@orange.com
Cc: pce@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=====_001_next====="
X-MAIL: mse-fl2.zte.com.cn x9825wL0075489
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/Tv5oySv8-aAbGUTlroPbCphXU8g>
Subject: Re: [Pce] Adoption of draft-li-pce-sr-path-segment?
X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Path Computation Element <pce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pce/>
List-Post: <mailto:pce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Oct 2019 02:06:22 -0000

Hi WG,

Support as a co-author. I think the draft is mature and steady and being implemented by ZTE Product.
I support the adoption of this draft.

Best Regards,
Quan












<<[Pce] Adoption of draft-li-pce-sr-path-segment?
<julien.meuric@orange.com> Wed, 25 September 2019 16:20 UTCShow header


Hi PCE WG,

In our adoption poll queue, draft-li-pce-sr-path-segment has been there
for a little while, after it was discussed face to face. We would now
like you to voice your opinion on the list: do you think this I-D can be
the foundation for a PCE WG's work item?

Please send your feedback to the PCE mailing list, including any comment
you would like to share, especially if you think the WG should not adopt
it. This poll will end on October 9.

Thanks,

Dhruv & Julien

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email