IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Pce] 转发: Adoption Poll for draft-dhodylee-pce-pcep-ls

韩柳燕 <hanliuyan@chinamobile.com> Tue, 16 April 2024 03:28 UTC

Return-Path: <hanliuyan@chinamobile.com>
X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49940C14F6B7 for <pce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 15 Apr 2024 20:28:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.884
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.884 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, KHOP_HELO_FCRDNS=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, T_SPF_TEMPERROR=0.01, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TC2gYTEG-Y93 for <pce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 15 Apr 2024 20:28:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cmccmta1.chinamobile.com (cmccmta2.chinamobile.com [111.22.67.135]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62238C14F5E8 for <pce@ietf.org>; Mon, 15 Apr 2024 20:28:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-RM-TagInfo: emlType=0
X-RM-SPAM-FLAG: 00000000
Received: from spf.mail.chinamobile.com (unknown[10.188.0.87]) by rmmx-syy-dmz-app03-12003 (RichMail) with SMTP id 2ee3661df05bfe1-407d3; Tue, 16 Apr 2024 11:28:27 +0800 (CST)
X-RM-TRANSID: 2ee3661df05bfe1-407d3
X-RM-SPAM-FLAG: 00000000
Received: from hanliuyan@chinamobile.com ( [10.2.55.100] ) by ajax-webmail-syy-appsvr03-11003 (Richmail) with HTTP; Tue, 16 Apr 2024 11:28:26 +0800 (CST)
Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2024 11:28:26 +0800
From: 韩柳燕 <hanliuyan@chinamobile.com>
To: "julien.meuric" <julien.meuric@orange.com>, pce <pce@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <2afb661de67e772-00121.Richmail.00006092650910411264@chinamobile.com>
References: <e16ecb4e-0787-4463-8ec7-9dc16f1f7078@orange.com>, <b9280b7117944429bb4ab238bafc9762@huawei.com>, <2afb661de67e772-0009a.Richmail.00008062754930014274@chinamobile.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_14903_260730536.1713238106707"
X-Priority: 3
X-RM-TRANSID: 2afb661de67e772-00121
Encrypt-Channel: web
X-RM-OA-ENC-TYPE: 0
X-RM-FontColor: 0
X-CLIENT-INFO: X-TIMING=0&X-MASSSENT=0&X-SENSITIVE=0
X-Mailer: Richmail_Webapp(V2.4.29)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/IRP71RpXYpG9DjXxHPsIscD0I1A>
Subject: Re: [Pce] 转发: Adoption Poll for draft-dhodylee-pce-pcep-ls
X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Path Computation Element <pce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pce/>
List-Post: <mailto:pce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2024 03:28:50 -0000

Hi all,



I support this work and adoption.



Best regards,

Liuyan Han







-----邮件原件-----发件人: Pce <pce-bounces@ietf.org> 代表 julien.meuric@orange.com发送时间: 2024年4月5日 0:19收件人: pce@ietf.org主题: [Pce] Adoption Poll for draft-dhodylee-pce-pcep-lsHi all,We have a long history around PCEP-LS. The rough consensus has been to progress it as experimental within the PCE WG, which makes more sense than an independent submission.As a result, do you support draft-dhodylee-pce-pcep-ls-27 [1] to become a PCE WG document? Please share your feedback using the PCE mailing list, including your comments and especially your rationales in case you39re opposed.Thank you,Julien---[1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-dhodylee-pce-pcep-ls/

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email