IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Pce] Adoption Poll for draft-dhodylee-pce-pcep-ls

Cheng Li <c.l@huawei.com> Tue, 16 April 2024 09:30 UTC

Return-Path: <c.l@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B26DC14F5EF for <pce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 16 Apr 2024 02:30:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.198
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.198 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id U0rYaQ_esQ8E for <pce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 16 Apr 2024 02:30:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frasgout.his.huawei.com (frasgout.his.huawei.com [185.176.79.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 264ADC14F617 for <pce@ietf.org>; Tue, 16 Apr 2024 02:30:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.maildlp.com (unknown [172.18.186.216]) by frasgout.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4VJdyB07cVz67nrk; Tue, 16 Apr 2024 17:28:34 +0800 (CST)
Received: from frapeml100003.china.huawei.com (unknown [7.182.85.60]) by mail.maildlp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7022A140B2F; Tue, 16 Apr 2024 17:30:30 +0800 (CST)
Received: from dggpemm500003.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.56) by frapeml100003.china.huawei.com (7.182.85.60) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.1.2507.35; Tue, 16 Apr 2024 11:30:29 +0200
Received: from dggpemm500003.china.huawei.com ([7.185.36.56]) by dggpemm500003.china.huawei.com ([7.185.36.56]) with mapi id 15.01.2507.035; Tue, 16 Apr 2024 17:30:27 +0800
From: Cheng Li <c.l@huawei.com>
To: "Pengshuping (Peng Shuping)" <pengshuping=40huawei.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, "julien.meuric@orange.com" <julien.meuric@orange.com>, "pce@ietf.org" <pce@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Pce] Adoption Poll for draft-dhodylee-pce-pcep-ls
Thread-Index: AQHahqwC04AWRDTaNkC3q+w6liWmrLFjwRWAgAbsimA=
Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2024 09:30:27 +0000
Message-ID: <e20667e40b6344fe907ddae398fb8c4e@huawei.com>
References: <e16ecb4e-0787-4463-8ec7-9dc16f1f7078@orange.com> <ee2adfa0fde34d2e88a38534f509d6be@huawei.com>
In-Reply-To: <ee2adfa0fde34d2e88a38534f509d6be@huawei.com>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.221.205.154]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/t985OKCWdNbo_vOroc4E2ZF-EDs>
Subject: Re: [Pce] Adoption Poll for draft-dhodylee-pce-pcep-ls
X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Path Computation Element <pce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pce/>
List-Post: <mailto:pce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2024 09:30:38 -0000

This is an important extension, and the content is well written, I support the adoption. Hope more people can work on it more critical when it becomes an WG draft.

Thanks,
Cheng


-----Original Message-----
From: Pce <pce-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Pengshuping (Peng Shuping)
Sent: Friday, April 12, 2024 9:23 AM
To: julien.meuric@orange.com; pce@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Pce] Adoption Poll for draft-dhodylee-pce-pcep-ls

Hi Julien, 

I support the WG adoption of this work. It has been a long time since this work was started. It is an useful experiment. It would be good if the WG adopts it and progresses it further, especially helps with the IANA issues as Adrian pointed out. 

Thank you! 

Best Regards,
Shuping 


-----Original Message-----
From: Pce <pce-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of julien.meuric@orange.com
Sent: Friday, April 5, 2024 12:19 AM
To: pce@ietf.org
Subject: [Pce] Adoption Poll for draft-dhodylee-pce-pcep-ls

Hi all,

We have a long history around PCEP-LS. The rough consensus has been to progress it as experimental within the PCE WG, which makes more sense than an independent submission.
As a result, do you support draft-dhodylee-pce-pcep-ls-27 [1] to become a PCE WG document? Please share your feedback using the PCE mailing list, including your comments and especially your rationales in case you're opposed.

Thank you,

Julien

---
[1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-dhodylee-pce-pcep-ls/

_______________________________________________
Pce mailing list
Pce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email