IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Pce] 回复: Adoption Poll for draft-dhodylee-pce-pcep-ls

Zhenghaomian <zhenghaomian@huawei.com> Sun, 14 April 2024 07:07 UTC

Return-Path: <zhenghaomian@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB1EEC14F68B for <pce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 14 Apr 2024 00:07:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.195
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.195 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pa3YCdSR8Hui for <pce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 14 Apr 2024 00:07:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frasgout.his.huawei.com (frasgout.his.huawei.com [185.176.79.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1B2ABC14E515 for <pce@ietf.org>; Sun, 14 Apr 2024 00:07:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.maildlp.com (unknown [172.18.186.231]) by frasgout.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4VHLtR6HZyz6JB7F for <pce@ietf.org>; Sun, 14 Apr 2024 15:05:51 +0800 (CST)
Received: from lhrpeml100002.china.huawei.com (unknown [7.191.160.241]) by mail.maildlp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8A1DF1402C7 for <pce@ietf.org>; Sun, 14 Apr 2024 15:07:42 +0800 (CST)
Received: from canpemm500009.china.huawei.com (7.192.105.203) by lhrpeml100002.china.huawei.com (7.191.160.241) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.1.2507.35; Sun, 14 Apr 2024 08:07:41 +0100
Received: from canpemm500009.china.huawei.com (7.192.105.203) by canpemm500009.china.huawei.com (7.192.105.203) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.1.2507.35; Sun, 14 Apr 2024 15:07:39 +0800
Received: from canpemm500009.china.huawei.com ([7.192.105.203]) by canpemm500009.china.huawei.com ([7.192.105.203]) with mapi id 15.01.2507.035; Sun, 14 Apr 2024 15:07:39 +0800
From: Zhenghaomian <zhenghaomian@huawei.com>
To: "julien.meuric@orange.com" <julien.meuric@orange.com>, "pce@ietf.org" <pce@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Pce] Adoption Poll for draft-dhodylee-pce-pcep-ls
Thread-Index: AQHahqwCONFVGkC9DEC3Z3OdNpr2E7FnZ1Uw
Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2024 07:07:39 +0000
Message-ID: <2f9dca62808f441e938cab1e4a8984ad@huawei.com>
References: <e16ecb4e-0787-4463-8ec7-9dc16f1f7078@orange.com>
In-Reply-To: <e16ecb4e-0787-4463-8ec7-9dc16f1f7078@orange.com>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.195.246.244]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/S_zsV1bcq5jXmYoy1_iKzyTPvYU>
Subject: [Pce] 回复: Adoption Poll for draft-dhodylee-pce-pcep-ls
X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Path Computation Element <pce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pce/>
List-Post: <mailto:pce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2024 07:07:51 -0000

Yes/Support, and happy to see this progress after the long journey😊

Best wishes,
Haomian

-----邮件原件-----
发件人: Pce <pce-bounces@ietf.org> 代表 julien.meuric@orange.com
发送时间: 2024年4月5日 0:19
收件人: pce@ietf.org
主题: [Pce] Adoption Poll for draft-dhodylee-pce-pcep-ls

Hi all,

We have a long history around PCEP-LS. The rough consensus has been to progress it as experimental within the PCE WG, which makes more sense than an independent submission.
As a result, do you support draft-dhodylee-pce-pcep-ls-27 [1] to become a PCE WG document? Please share your feedback using the PCE mailing list, including your comments and especially your rationales in case you're opposed.

Thank you,

Julien

---
[1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-dhodylee-pce-pcep-ls/

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email