Re: [Pce] Adoption Poll for draft-dhodylee-pce-pcep-ls

Lizhenbin <lizhenbin@huawei.com> Thu, 18 April 2024 18:02 UTC

Return-Path: <lizhenbin@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 341ECC14F5E8 for <pce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 18 Apr 2024 11:02:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.325
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.325 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, INVALID_MSGID=0.568, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SDV-3kyh7Ujq for <pce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 18 Apr 2024 11:02:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frasgout.his.huawei.com (frasgout.his.huawei.com [185.176.79.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 403B1C14F6E4 for <pce@ietf.org>; Thu, 18 Apr 2024 11:02:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.maildlp.com (unknown [172.18.186.231]) by frasgout.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4VL58c5DBwz67cSV for <pce@ietf.org>; Fri, 19 Apr 2024 01:57:36 +0800 (CST)
Received: from lhrpeml100004.china.huawei.com (unknown [7.191.162.219]) by mail.maildlp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0FC9B140519 for <pce@ietf.org>; Fri, 19 Apr 2024 02:02:36 +0800 (CST)
Received: from dggpemm500005.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.74) by lhrpeml100004.china.huawei.com (7.191.162.219) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.1.2507.35; Thu, 18 Apr 2024 19:02:35 +0100
Received: from dggpemm500008.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.136) by dggpemm500005.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.74) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.1.2507.35; Fri, 19 Apr 2024 02:02:32 +0800
Received: from dggpemm500008.china.huawei.com ([7.185.36.136]) by dggpemm500008.china.huawei.com ([7.185.36.136]) with mapi id 15.01.2507.035; Fri, 19 Apr 2024 02:02:32 +0800
From: Lizhenbin <lizhenbin@huawei.com>
To: "julien.meuric" <julien.meuric@orange.com>, pce <pce@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Pce] Adoption Poll for draft-dhodylee-pce-pcep-ls
Thread-Index: AQHahqwClpvmXIk73E6nfVxOIyWmBrFuZ9RE
Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2024 18:02:32 +0000
Message-ID: 086598B5-A038-45D0-AB21-F88CFD07A22E
References: <e16ecb4e-0787-4463-8ec7-9dc16f1f7078@orange.com>
In-Reply-To: <e16ecb4e-0787-4463-8ec7-9dc16f1f7078@orange.com>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_086598B5A03845D0AB21F88CFD07A22E_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/MIkgz01Ea94iVedSzxj3h9clD6U>
Subject: Re: [Pce] Adoption Poll for draft-dhodylee-pce-pcep-ls
X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Path Computation Element <pce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pce/>
List-Post: <mailto:pce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2024 18:02:43 -0000

Hi all,
I support the WG adoption of the draft. This work started long time ago. Currently there is the real requirement to export information in the scenario related with IP + optical. They prefers PCEP other than BGP.


Best Regards,
Zhenbin (Robin)



________________________________

李振斌 Li Zhenbin
Mobile: +86-13651017745/+968-91797068
Email: lizhenbin@huawei.com

发件人:julien.meuric <julien.meuric@orange.com<mailto:julien.meuric@orange.com>>
收件人:pce <pce@ietf.org<mailto:pce@ietf.org>>
时 间:2024-04-04 18:20:29
主 题:[Pce] Adoption Poll for draft-dhodylee-pce-pcep-ls

Hi all,

We have a long history around PCEP-LS. The rough consensus has been to
progress it as experimental within the PCE WG, which makes more sense
than an independent submission.
As a result, do you support draft-dhodylee-pce-pcep-ls-27 [1] to become
a PCE WG document? Please share your feedback using the PCE mailing
list, including your comments and especially your rationales in case
you're opposed.

Thank you,

Julien

---
[1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-dhodylee-pce-pcep-ls/