[Pce] 答复: Opsdir early review of draft-ietf-pce-pcep-extension-native-ip-29

Aijun Wang <wangaijun@tsinghua.org.cn> Thu, 01 February 2024 02:10 UTC

Return-Path: <wangaijun@tsinghua.org.cn>
X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB3E7C14F683; Wed, 31 Jan 2024 18:10:35 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.906
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.906 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PSFZtkMqHpXq; Wed, 31 Jan 2024 18:10:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-m25499.xmail.ntesmail.com (mail-m25499.xmail.ntesmail.com [103.129.254.99]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F1FB4C14EB19; Wed, 31 Jan 2024 18:10:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from LAPTOP09T7970K (unknown [219.142.69.75]) by smtp.qiye.163.com (Hmail) with ESMTPA id E09777E0129; Thu, 1 Feb 2024 10:10:20 +0800 (CST)
From: Aijun Wang <wangaijun@tsinghua.org.cn>
To: 'Sheng Jiang' <shengjiang@bupt.edu.cn>, ops-dir@ietf.org
Cc: draft-ietf-pce-pcep-extension-native-ip.all@ietf.org, pce@ietf.org
References: <170662653660.22023.858119500427067548@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <170662653660.22023.858119500427067548@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Thu, 01 Feb 2024 10:10:20 +0800
Message-ID: <000d01da54b3$cecbe8c0$6c63ba40$@tsinghua.org.cn>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="gb2312"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0
Thread-Index: AQJ3Qzc9kKCc8OGwnTbeej/Ovz0se6+64L5Q
Content-Language: zh-cn
X-HM-Spam-Status: e1kfGhgUHx5ZQUpXWQgPGg8OCBgUHx5ZQUlOS1dZFg8aDwILHllBWSg2Ly tZV1koWUFKTEtLSjdXWS1ZQUlXWQ8JGhUIEh9ZQVlCS0lMVkMYQ00aS0hJQh4aGFUTARMWGhIXJB QOD1lXWRgSC1lBWUlKQlVKT0lVTUJVTE5ZV1kWGg8SFR0UWUFZT0tIVUpNT0lOSFVKS0tVSkJLS1 kG
X-HM-Tid: 0a8d626e6f0103a2kunme09777e0129
X-HM-MType: 10
X-HM-Sender-Digest: e1kMHhlZQR0aFwgeV1kSHx4VD1lBWUc6MFE6GBw5LDMWOk4vND8vCRY0 TwMaCTJVSlVKTEtNTE5IT0lKT01MVTMWGhIXVQwaFRwaEhEOFTsPCBIVHBMOGlUUCRxVGBVFWVdZ EgtZQVlJSkJVSk9JVU1CVUxOWVdZCAFZQUhKSUs3Bg++
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/qs0HCwq_l5J0eAa9kQfOFhug6X0>
Subject: [Pce] 答复: Opsdir early review of draft-ietf-pce-pcep-extension-native-ip-29
X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Path Computation Element <pce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pce/>
List-Post: <mailto:pce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Feb 2024 02:10:35 -0000

Hi, Sheng:

Thanks for your review.
I have updated the draft to address your concerns/comments, and will upload
it together with other reviews.

Aijun Wang

-----邮件原件-----
发件人: forwardingalgorithm@ietf.org [mailto:forwardingalgorithm@ietf.org]
代表 Sheng Jiang via Datatracker
发送时间: 2024年1月30日 22:56
收件人: ops-dir@ietf.org
抄送: draft-ietf-pce-pcep-extension-native-ip.all@ietf.org; pce@ietf.org
主题: [Pce] Opsdir early review of
draft-ietf-pce-pcep-extension-native-ip-29

Reviewer: Sheng Jiang
Review result: Has Nits

I have reviewed this document as part of the OPS directorate's ongoing
effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. Comments
that are not addressed in last call may be included in AD reviews during the
IESG review. Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.

Document: draft-ietf-pce-pcep-extension-native-ip-29
Reviewer: Sheng Jiang
Review Date: 2024-01-30
Result: Has Nits

This Standards Track document defines the Path Computation Element
Communication Protocol (PCEP) extension for Central Control Dynamic Routing
(CCDR) based applications in Native IP networks.

114: requireHs --> requires
127: nexthops --> next hops
464: lead --> leads
618: nexthop --> next hop
702: soley --> solely
845: multihop --> multi-hop 

There are many places that the "s" after the third person singular verbs are
missing.


_______________________________________________
Pce mailing list
Pce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce