IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Pce] WG Adoption of draft-li-pce-pcep-pmtu-05

Aijun Wang <wangaijun@tsinghua.org.cn> Tue, 29 March 2022 02:45 UTC

Return-Path: <wangaijun@tsinghua.org.cn>
X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92DB43A10D4; Mon, 28 Mar 2022 19:45:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.905
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.905 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EDvpLUpLkM2G; Mon, 28 Mar 2022 19:45:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-m17638.qiye.163.com (mail-m17638.qiye.163.com [59.111.176.38]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4CAA03A10D3; Mon, 28 Mar 2022 19:45:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from DESKTOP2IOH5QC (unknown [219.142.69.75]) by mail-m17638.qiye.163.com (Hmail) with ESMTPA id 876011C04D7; Tue, 29 Mar 2022 10:37:16 +0800 (CST)
From: Aijun Wang <wangaijun@tsinghua.org.cn>
To: 'Dhruv Dhody' <dd@dhruvdhody.com>, pce@ietf.org
Cc: draft-li-pce-pcep-pmtu@ietf.org
References: <CAP7zK5bC95SwqbPC-Fm1-bTyAmaVOb-O5Bg4CKqe3tSe=LUzZQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAP7zK5bC95SwqbPC-Fm1-bTyAmaVOb-O5Bg4CKqe3tSe=LUzZQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2022 10:37:15 +0800
Message-ID: <00a001d84315$e7709940$b651cbc0$@tsinghua.org.cn>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_00A1_01D84358.F5967150"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0
Thread-Index: AQKyG+f95LxrZ2vzof1asfnJSV9oYash7mvg
Content-Language: zh-cn
X-HM-Spam-Status: e1kfGhgUHx5ZQUtXWQgPGg8OCBgUHx5ZQUlOS1dZCBgUCR5ZQVlLVUtZV1 kWDxoPAgseWUFZKDYvK1lXWShZQUpMS0tKN1dZLVlBSVdZDwkaFQgSH1lBWRpPH0tWHUNKS0seT0 lPSxhOVRMBExYaEhckFA4PWVdZFhoPEhUdFFlBWU9LSFVKSktISkxVS1kG
X-HM-Sender-Digest: e1kMHhlZQR0aFwgeV1kSHx4VD1lBWUc6NVE6PDo6TT4BCQsDQxktKRcZ PiIKFDFVSlVKTU9DTklKT0hNQk1OVTMWGhIXVQwaFRwaEhEOFTsPCBIVHBMOGlUUCRxVGBVFWVdZ EgtZQVlJSkJVSk9JVU1CVUxOWVdZCAFZQUpISElCNwY+
X-HM-Tid: 0a7fd388ddf6d993kuws876011c04d7
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/tmiOaZsHcvAaKFVwBwKYkn_jlMk>
Subject: Re: [Pce] WG Adoption of draft-li-pce-pcep-pmtu-05
X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Path Computation Element <pce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pce/>
List-Post: <mailto:pce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2022 02:45:56 -0000

Hi, Dhruv:

I have read this document and support it adoption.

Some suggestions for the current contents are the followings:

1.     The proposal in this draft is easy to understand, It is better to simplify the “Introduction” part.

2.     There should be one section about “Procedures for the Path MTU calculation”, which can include the some contents in section 3.1, section 3.2, section 3.5

3.     Section 3.3 and 3.4 should be put in one independent section, such as “Application of the Path MTU Metric”?

 

Best Regards

 

Aijun Wang

China Telecom

 

From: pce-bounces@ietf.org <pce-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Dhruv Dhody
Sent: Tuesday, March 29, 2022 12:09 AM
To: pce@ietf.org
Cc: draft-li-pce-pcep-pmtu@ietf.org
Subject: [Pce] WG Adoption of draft-li-pce-pcep-pmtu-05

 

Hi WG,

This email begins the WG adoption poll for draft-li-pce-pcep-pmtu-05.

 

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-li-pce-pcep-pmtu/

 

Should this draft be adopted by the PCE WG? Please state your reasons - Why / Why not? What needs to be fixed before or after adoption? Are you willing to work on this draft? Review comments should be posted to the list.

Please respond by Monday 11th April 2022.

Thanks!
Dhruv & Julien

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email