IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Pce] Adoption of draft-li-pce-sr-bidir-path-06?

<xiong.quan@zte.com.cn> Mon, 20 January 2020 06:50 UTC

Return-Path: <xiong.quan@zte.com.cn>
X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C96E1200B3; Sun, 19 Jan 2020 22:50:53 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.198
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.198 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Dot0RRBkPFd1; Sun, 19 Jan 2020 22:50:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mxhk.zte.com.cn (mxhk.zte.com.cn [63.217.80.70]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3C472120025; Sun, 19 Jan 2020 22:50:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mse-fl1.zte.com.cn (unknown [10.30.14.238]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTPS id 8C08F47ADB3BDE6805F4; Mon, 20 Jan 2020 14:50:44 +0800 (CST)
Received: from njxapp05.zte.com.cn ([10.41.132.204]) by mse-fl1.zte.com.cn with SMTP id 00K6o8xB083488; Mon, 20 Jan 2020 14:50:08 +0800 (GMT-8) (envelope-from xiong.quan@zte.com.cn)
Received: from mapi (njxapp02[null]) by mapi (Zmail) with MAPI id mid201; Mon, 20 Jan 2020 14:50:07 +0800 (CST)
Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2020 14:50:07 +0800
X-Zmail-TransId: 2afa5e254d9f47e07c9c
X-Mailer: Zmail v1.0
Message-ID: <202001201450078280862@zte.com.cn>
Mime-Version: 1.0
From: xiong.quan@zte.com.cn
To: pce@ietf.org
Cc: pce-chairs@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=====_001_next====="
X-MAIL: mse-fl1.zte.com.cn 00K6o8xB083488
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/tonu7HOOkGo-z3hWLxSdgfa0fhU>
Subject: Re: [Pce] Adoption of draft-li-pce-sr-bidir-path-06?
X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Path Computation Element <pce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pce/>
List-Post: <mailto:pce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2020 06:50:53 -0000

Dear Chairs,




I support as a co-author.  




Thanks,

Quan







<<[Pce] Adoption of draft-li-pce-sr-bidir-path-06?
<julien.meuric@orange.com> Fri, 17 January 2020 10:12 UTCShow header


Hi all,

It is time to share your thoughts about draft-li-pce-sr-bidir-path-06.
Do you believe the I-D is a right foundation for a PCE WG item? Please
use the PCE mailing list to express your comments, support or
disagreement, including applicable rationale, especially for the latter.

Thanks,

Dhruv & Julien

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email