IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Perc] Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf-perc-dtls-tunnel-09: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Suhas Nandakumar <suhasietf@gmail.com> Tue, 28 September 2021 04:05 UTC

Return-Path: <suhasietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: perc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: perc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92B243A1A71; Mon, 27 Sep 2021 21:05:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iVI0_v6FWKGQ; Mon, 27 Sep 2021 21:05:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ua1-x92a.google.com (mail-ua1-x92a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::92a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 479AB3A1A2F; Mon, 27 Sep 2021 21:05:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ua1-x92a.google.com with SMTP id i8so11620206uae.7; Mon, 27 Sep 2021 21:05:02 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=lTLogfYs9KDD816DYVMN313IU1CMM7AH4bEceI3V/xM=; b=J8MBKVxUgZREo8K4teuVRl5yOX24zm1hp2lZZ3RANOb+Y81WzG4V32guB9H9Zpaahc zabzzrgtJEO4jiIdi3yI7ychbjG9WSmhjqq+sTIOwzt3Uw7tBYmGElH6asAuDuCnBzYm eDuq9H2zRL2ZquoLHdyY3KopQyvMDq+wJk0k94nvGFJ2cSyCK2vCLuT4Ou93vA6YCRGp hrT5+go0Ldj/99J648Mg0zS1MUt3pZZJN57nkLtFm9qM5llzU2IOL5MOJvgw1j40dVKj 4A7MF6W+VYa3DPYgWp4hp8nxedkC/UK3RCZTV6CdT1KJ6htkUw80Ln9pD3AjNkj4kOcs 7vLg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=lTLogfYs9KDD816DYVMN313IU1CMM7AH4bEceI3V/xM=; b=ISKsREZCDR82DNdKVxt88JWdE9C6MiOO2mVoKvbtNc+mB3aik/jEvflZgNKKPARLbO ujvDYBewThO1sCw7bZNc6fr9N4ooavFUkgZJAUH5jgFvFEeLtl2+yEJsOyHXn02WYhBY iwVVO15HlqXK0I3BXi+jNMYrJ9PDHrgNFTpdZuXwqI6Gi/zb+MVuLLjjsTqmT5jdYTeU N+etuUu5++iJ8q91BIgKpGzNxmi22UIKnaTCodpxyMgYIeE3EJ0BWuvC6pCt3/J6++DX bovwedkVY0cFthaBPtyX8kR9BlMTXEvAO4j0y5tmQSMfdGuGmhHqFfu0E/zX/Cawapem ed3Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533+QVH+gzCSVIHEnUhR8x7tRAog72vV3mzAAtUzxhmj+DXFCiAq F3ER4Z66zp0FRGBNJjPh88wsJcImKAcvRM63bvo=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwkKPQMawU+dFc5tbj9PObsYrG7aKDY/YkSpqNi8iiC8zxr+YH2KEy6koGr70rCvLQ4WxVtwVYK2RO/pzWrjFw=
X-Received: by 2002:a9f:234a:: with SMTP id 68mr3253237uae.13.1632801901296; Mon, 27 Sep 2021 21:05:01 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <162510321507.13724.12968550804927630403@ietfa.amsl.com> <emf2164c70-5bda-4e41-aa5e-08eb27232cef@sydney> <CAL0qLwb12yh6p6cK21bD8PWM7F_co8NYyy+oqsmg80VT6CZZwg@mail.gmail.com> <235FA332-7A68-4189-B74E-52D7276AE8AD@iii.ca> <CAL0qLwbD+jRnC1sexQhoVk_Zvt2vKsjtsq29TYgqZs9coM3QNA@mail.gmail.com> <CAL0qLwZLoN=GR8dezd_mafisR867F=pMiYQ2pmJr3EPMZeEA=A@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAL0qLwZLoN=GR8dezd_mafisR867F=pMiYQ2pmJr3EPMZeEA=A@mail.gmail.com>
From: Suhas Nandakumar <suhasietf@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2021 21:04:50 -0700
Message-ID: <CAMRcRGSXUOVruR0+nbg8_PWELyH3jD8WaU0yoO2jfnymXbLXDQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>
Cc: Cullen Jennings <fluffy@iii.ca>, Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu>, Paul Jones <paulej@packetizer.com>, perc@ietf.org, perc-chairs@ietf.org, draft-ietf-perc-dtls-tunnel@ietf.org, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000050be1005cd065128"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/perc/-ee9n7LRRoqX3zFInQlRPL5MEMM>
Subject: Re: [Perc] Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf-perc-dtls-tunnel-09: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: perc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Privacy Enhanced RTP Conferencing <perc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/perc>, <mailto:perc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/perc/>
List-Post: <mailto:perc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:perc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/perc>, <mailto:perc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2021 04:05:18 -0000

On Wed, Sep 22, 2021 at 11:56 PM Murray S. Kucherawy <superuser@gmail.com>
wrote:

> On Wed, Sep 22, 2021 at 10:29 PM Murray S. Kucherawy <superuser@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>>
>> I’m having a hard time understanding the problem here. As far as I know
>>> there is no requirement for a document to be standards track to create an
>>> IANA registry - am I missing something? I was under the belief that a
>>> document does not even need to be part of the IETF stream for inclusion
>>> into IANA.
>>>
>>> I would rather see this document published than go back to WGLC.
>>>
>>
>> I'll follow up with Ben and the others during the next IESG telechat (in
>> about nine hours)
>>
>
> I did this just now, and he reminds me that the IESG on review of this
> document found that it actually meets the bar for Proposed Standard, since
> it specifies a protocol with interoperable implementations, and we were
> wondering if the Working Group really wanted to stick with Informational.
> The IANA question was secondary.
>
> So I'm happy to send it through as-is, but I wanted to get that point
> covered first.  Unfortunately I have had very little success getting anyone
> to answer my inquiries.
>

[Suhas]  From what I understand, authors are fine with either Standards
track or an Informational reference. Informational was chosen with the
intent of helping have a standard reference to enable interop and if IESG
experts recommend the spec could be a Standards track one, we should be ok
with it . Hope this helps

>
> -MSK
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email