IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Perc] Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf-perc-dtls-tunnel-09: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

"Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com> Thu, 23 September 2021 06:56 UTC

Return-Path: <superuser@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: perc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: perc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 948D53A23DC; Wed, 22 Sep 2021 23:56:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zxhPLSuR0ixi; Wed, 22 Sep 2021 23:56:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vk1-xa33.google.com (mail-vk1-xa33.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::a33]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A9DCA3A23DA; Wed, 22 Sep 2021 23:56:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-vk1-xa33.google.com with SMTP id h132so2177723vke.8; Wed, 22 Sep 2021 23:56:39 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=deg2MHiZNqT9TQ6x7wt3fQh0qlpFwzIN2uJZF6PxgBk=; b=Y2RT5uOfLT2ato3yx97gIc+3eP+9bJgqO9r4rWYUfFjp42HLapmpiaR9f8NLFVtUYK wrzmk9bPQEBzwo/zrrCXDU/cMuFYIfLSv3lHJ6ef5rI0wFi+V3z+lZmmyjAY6KdoShCx 2WxJFc3lFGTCvql7aVaobSM5cg5AmoMIuyqRdWaOeDDIGHksFjrk5zWUeb7/21l5gZIR ggOcl/taULM8nGbvJLLl769SxO7ofzbBmdtcJSaIlsp+w03/IzHqO5yeqqG2eX9fWBjt L7b3Daf/8SFCXro/8kvC3YkenFhEJQVU7VMKSeflmHDCmM3JveBY9gc8W3tSkopDrgQL FqbQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=deg2MHiZNqT9TQ6x7wt3fQh0qlpFwzIN2uJZF6PxgBk=; b=hwzay0B1yFE+L3ibFpMmPkUwH2JTAaLyJtF8sKn0kU3qJW8rN2pCFgtpSpvrAxmBHG bA48Iu5uggJEGRs7q84UDsZN09ZFJX5M4ncgP7Fdh7iX5pVLY5bpm2RTbgAy4eRfE84J +/xfO/QrnCAOZiaPg1S/r1+PgE3RUaaBjVSPw5AK5znJiA4KNyAxbWePrIvQUisg35Jd ZXbBzIXu0MttJyR/LnP62CBXsXQSc8QnSDaiAKR7EmqpZ1e2xnKYr1Z/ZaxxNplXGpGu YDo0h/9b1pLSmZzBQARi8QKdCvpu+8KoQ2mKNb0aiU/FSEyt4lf6rFSfB3KtW4n6dgAb jcEQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531P5WPI0hbXY1vJFsCzX1XCFu4LdGgkCaYV+UcEaN6dRpVgdpUa 4vp9W4GoYmrLYe11499D6a3vpixCviupcOmDJFE=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzKceY2OvLaeQuP7UzzBGTwlfVjYmJy6fY3V3AiZARQpnEM4y+T50nM0r16hn67nZOjJFw1sveWywbFgzALZXk=
X-Received: by 2002:a1f:ad46:: with SMTP id w67mr2357593vke.16.1632380198466; Wed, 22 Sep 2021 23:56:38 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <162510321507.13724.12968550804927630403@ietfa.amsl.com> <emf2164c70-5bda-4e41-aa5e-08eb27232cef@sydney> <CAL0qLwb12yh6p6cK21bD8PWM7F_co8NYyy+oqsmg80VT6CZZwg@mail.gmail.com> <235FA332-7A68-4189-B74E-52D7276AE8AD@iii.ca> <CAL0qLwbD+jRnC1sexQhoVk_Zvt2vKsjtsq29TYgqZs9coM3QNA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAL0qLwbD+jRnC1sexQhoVk_Zvt2vKsjtsq29TYgqZs9coM3QNA@mail.gmail.com>
From: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2021 23:56:27 -0700
Message-ID: <CAL0qLwZLoN=GR8dezd_mafisR867F=pMiYQ2pmJr3EPMZeEA=A@mail.gmail.com>
To: Cullen Jennings <fluffy@iii.ca>
Cc: Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu>, Paul Jones <paulej@packetizer.com>, Suhas Nandakumar <suhasietf@gmail.com>, perc@ietf.org, perc-chairs@ietf.org, draft-ietf-perc-dtls-tunnel@ietf.org, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000de3a4805cca4217b"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/perc/ETXr10xAq4-oMn9Oo6TiIXZdEGw>
Subject: Re: [Perc] Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf-perc-dtls-tunnel-09: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: perc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Privacy Enhanced RTP Conferencing <perc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/perc>, <mailto:perc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/perc/>
List-Post: <mailto:perc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:perc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/perc>, <mailto:perc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2021 06:56:42 -0000

On Wed, Sep 22, 2021 at 10:29 PM Murray S. Kucherawy <superuser@gmail.com>
wrote:

>
> I’m having a hard time understanding the problem here. As far as I know
>> there is no requirement for a document to be standards track to create an
>> IANA registry - am I missing something? I was under the belief that a
>> document does not even need to be part of the IETF stream for inclusion
>> into IANA.
>>
>> I would rather see this document published than go back to WGLC.
>>
>
> I'll follow up with Ben and the others during the next IESG telechat (in
> about nine hours)
>

I did this just now, and he reminds me that the IESG on review of this
document found that it actually meets the bar for Proposed Standard, since
it specifies a protocol with interoperable implementations, and we were
wondering if the Working Group really wanted to stick with Informational.
The IANA question was secondary.

So I'm happy to send it through as-is, but I wanted to get that point
covered first.  Unfortunately I have had very little success getting anyone
to answer my inquiries.

-MSK

v2.27.8 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status