Re: [Perc] Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf-perc-dtls-tunnel-09: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

"Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com> Thu, 23 September 2021 05:29 UTC

Return-Path: <superuser@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: perc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: perc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F4A33A20AB; Wed, 22 Sep 2021 22:29:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4UH2DXNypwey; Wed, 22 Sep 2021 22:29:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vs1-xe2f.google.com (mail-vs1-xe2f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::e2f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 998843A20A9; Wed, 22 Sep 2021 22:29:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-vs1-xe2f.google.com with SMTP id y141so5358015vsy.5; Wed, 22 Sep 2021 22:29:45 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=pTh6c+prQoRxuEMoxO1L9/jaodO9tMAv8qt+zFDQn/U=; b=EzSNxxN/SzNhXD108pVXOnRH1F89Y3icL8G5Ur82UW2g5PPcZTw2FNGh6rfT85JjwR XYfPaiUzPHBetm6xTyegKnguuigbLFech/eqOZ46acbBagblD2m7vbWiJxd4OBL7wGF3 xJeT631fUBVUhTIlMQrQPdmtcrkFRhm0bSph0tzys08yGqg7SPNJRd1Gbvyys+YLvkO/ d/Pg4se+zRqPoNIEexuT1vrd62Ni+tvyQpGImyPnEey0QGvFfHwnUqOD932Pel+fl5Qy EX9XXJzVFi0Js+PSxlGCZeVtVmW232jMTsy45enWmJkYgcvySykdJkuyP1Zyf6qCGgwO 3qhg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=pTh6c+prQoRxuEMoxO1L9/jaodO9tMAv8qt+zFDQn/U=; b=6xnkbVhhYk8JuqavekSgW18qidsAqq4jpASFKZQ13gbLo9PPplxDphCk8/X8OjJy94 jbStVrt6eM8dNdxxauojJlZl37IIJ3lEGrdKLTJd4oROKXKunjpOi/P147DqGssKPmXR FlMdoOZmA1taEdoFDk904a/xHiIb54CmwrcssCq2VjJ2qNj08KasdtR/vDmpveVpqe4i PcvDD8h7rVRrapgyCmXt/HWeUaqr62tRRSgoZvnHszD3+xdHG9osbXCDYSVSYckPxnFQ IlQC/QYcS7C5tHD2Rtj4vsKAKS+7OH0Yn77hrfO939cawY2HpjqFciLe2QDtmYITdZfJ geVg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5339/BY79AiNSBsxM6WmQXBVunnTGibqr1FhI/forhJlz9+4z1TF dhrFOl3PNKA3OXmsnoM4XBaCiaxLxXFhUkMvmaY=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyEbgfid9W69ZgsGOmDHEEj9S09cvjcnPoucujMc3IQxTt5bv0xCM/4UOdGjwZ0Y9qDJsnGHTByjkSrrrtHvjw=
X-Received: by 2002:a67:c989:: with SMTP id y9mr2852506vsk.12.1632374984501; Wed, 22 Sep 2021 22:29:44 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <162510321507.13724.12968550804927630403@ietfa.amsl.com> <emf2164c70-5bda-4e41-aa5e-08eb27232cef@sydney> <CAL0qLwb12yh6p6cK21bD8PWM7F_co8NYyy+oqsmg80VT6CZZwg@mail.gmail.com> <235FA332-7A68-4189-B74E-52D7276AE8AD@iii.ca>
In-Reply-To: <235FA332-7A68-4189-B74E-52D7276AE8AD@iii.ca>
From: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2021 22:29:33 -0700
Message-ID: <CAL0qLwbD+jRnC1sexQhoVk_Zvt2vKsjtsq29TYgqZs9coM3QNA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Cullen Jennings <fluffy@iii.ca>
Cc: Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu>, Paul Jones <paulej@packetizer.com>, Suhas Nandakumar <suhasietf@gmail.com>, perc@ietf.org, perc-chairs@ietf.org, draft-ietf-perc-dtls-tunnel@ietf.org, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000176c0505cca2eb5b"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/perc/92Pt6NKlZ86GaJnxe8TYn2u0PF8>
Subject: Re: [Perc] Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf-perc-dtls-tunnel-09: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: perc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Privacy Enhanced RTP Conferencing <perc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/perc>, <mailto:perc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/perc/>
List-Post: <mailto:perc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:perc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/perc>, <mailto:perc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2021 05:29:52 -0000

On Tue, Sep 7, 2021 at 1:57 PM Cullen Jennings <fluffy@iii.ca> wrote:

> On Thu, Aug 5, 2021 at 6:17 PM Paul E. Jones <paulej=
> 40packetizer.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
>
>
>> (2) I'll also mention here so that the IESG can talk about it during our
>> telechat (but with no intent to insist on a change): this document
>> specifies a versioned protocol and creates a registry. Are we happy
>> with the current Informational status, as opposed to Proposed Standard?
>> I do see that the topic was touched on in the shepherd writeup, but the
>> treatment there did not feel especially compelling to me.
>>
>>
>> Hopefully that got resolved.  I'll await instructions on any requested
>> changes here.
>>
>
> I'm not aware of a resolution.  I never got a reply after my message of
> July 1, where I suggested some possible paths by the working group.
>
> -MSK
>
>
> I’m having a hard time understanding the problem here. As far as I know
> there is no requirement for a document to be standards track to create an
> IANA registry - am I missing something? I was under the belief that a
> document does not even need to be part of the IETF stream for inclusion
> into IANA.
>
> I would rather see this document published than go back to WGLC.
>

I'll follow up with Ben and the others during the next IESG telechat (in
about nine hours).

In any event, it looks like Paul needs to post a new version before this
can go forward.

-MSK