IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [perpass] comments and questions for the group on draft-farrell-perpass-attack-02

Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com> Mon, 09 December 2013 13:59 UTC

Return-Path: <lear@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: perpass@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: perpass@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0528C1AE2C1; Mon, 9 Dec 2013 05:59:22 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.501
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.501 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id T4em6_u0u5Qe; Mon, 9 Dec 2013 05:59:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: from aer-iport-2.cisco.com (aer-iport-2.cisco.com [173.38.203.52]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7931B1ADF52; Mon, 9 Dec 2013 05:59:19 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1428; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1386597556; x=1387807156; h=message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:cc:subject: references:in-reply-to; bh=g4IDJMnQoAV6MIXwxmtVciPhI18wzB544YV773+4tzk=; b=MtuNU6GCobZvNG5F2GPtgYdYo8IeUgKIsHQYeWK440sR4Gfyd55cjEyl 45XCM8itr3wN8kh68n4eqj6KJx4UvYnHlecHBqQYZ4nTKLurm81+lIK0/ crn+DLJUpWRhp3kEMpqwXscjqLQyAXwKD2/FLIKZDZfTDt3MxDTGtXGE9 o=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Ah4FAIDLpVKQ/khN/2dsb2JhbABZgweECrYWgS8WdIIcCQEBAQQjVQEQCwMBCgoJFgsCAgkDAgECAUUGAQwBBwEBh36yAo8sF48QB4JrgUgDmBSSE4FrgT87
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.93,858,1378857600"; d="scan'208,217";a="1301566"
Received: from ams-core-4.cisco.com ([144.254.72.77]) by aer-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 09 Dec 2013 13:59:14 +0000
Received: from ams3-vpn-dhcp5161.cisco.com (ams3-vpn-dhcp5161.cisco.com [10.61.84.40]) by ams-core-4.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id rB9DxAD7006452 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 9 Dec 2013 13:59:10 GMT
Message-ID: <52A5CCB6.8070108@cisco.com>
Date: Mon, 09 Dec 2013 14:59:18 +0100
From: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.8; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.1.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Eric Burger <eburger@standardstrack.com>, perpass <perpass@ietf.org>
References: <7wmom0dq1s8yyc5t1qpvdxxl.1386593028146@email.android.com>
In-Reply-To: <7wmom0dq1s8yyc5t1qpvdxxl.1386593028146@email.android.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------080703020501070104060109"
Cc: Internet Architecture Board <iab@iab.org>, 'IESG' <iesg@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [perpass] comments and questions for the group on draft-farrell-perpass-attack-02
X-BeenThere: perpass@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "The perpass list is for IETF discussion of pervasive monitoring. " <perpass.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/perpass>, <mailto:perpass-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/perpass/>
List-Post: <mailto:perpass@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:perpass-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/perpass>, <mailto:perpass-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Dec 2013 13:59:22 -0000

On 12/9/13 1:43 PM, Eric Burger wrote:
> So if the "operational realities" of the operator include a mandate to
> intercept, like with a law like CALEA in the United States, then
> pervasive monitoring is OK?
>

This does not negate the existing RFCs that speak to that.

Eliot

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email