Re: [perpass] comments and questions for the group on draft-farrell-perpass-attack-02

Paul Ferguson <fergdawgster@mykolab.com> Mon, 09 December 2013 20:40 UTC

Return-Path: <fergdawgster@mykolab.com>
X-Original-To: perpass@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: perpass@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACFE21AE0A7 for <perpass@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Dec 2013 12:40:18 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eyrF52x_WtT2 for <perpass@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Dec 2013 12:40:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx01.mykolab.com (mx01.mykolab.com [95.128.36.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59E631AE559 for <perpass@ietf.org>; Mon, 9 Dec 2013 12:40:16 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at kolabsys.net
Sender: fergdawgster@mykolab.com
Message-ID: <52A62AA0.40809@mykolab.com>
Date: Mon, 09 Dec 2013 12:40:00 -0800
From: Paul Ferguson <fergdawgster@mykolab.com>
Organization: Clowns R. Mofos
To: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>, Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>
References: <52A5B79E.2040202@cisco.com> <52A5C458.200@cs.tcd.ie>
In-Reply-To: <52A5C458.200@cs.tcd.ie>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: perpass <perpass@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [perpass] comments and questions for the group on draft-farrell-perpass-attack-02
X-BeenThere: perpass@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: fergdawgster@mykolab.com
List-Id: "The perpass list is for IETF discussion of pervasive monitoring. " <perpass.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/perpass>, <mailto:perpass-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/perpass/>
List-Post: <mailto:perpass@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:perpass-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/perpass>, <mailto:perpass-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Dec 2013 20:40:18 -0000

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 12/9/2013 5:23 AM, Stephen Farrell wrote:

 >> That
 >> >wouldn't be appropriate, in my opinion.  A working group must consider
 >> >the operational realities that it is attempting to code to.  There are
 >> >many tensions to consider, not just a narrow view of network management
 >> >(a phrase that might itself be left to ambiguous interpretation).

 > "Operational realities" is far more vague IMO. Perhaps even dangerously
 > so since it could be used to attempt to justify pretty much anything.

That is also my interpretation/fear here. :-/

- - ferg

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP Desktop 10.2.0 (Build 2317)
Charset: utf-8

wj8DBQFSpiqbq1pz9mNUZTMRAqmRAKDvetOQM3wAAD5q/NqMNSVRL/7yxgCdGOdD
7kOXcUdQiPWaxZmpptdNmiw=
=U5uT
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


-- 
Paul Ferguson
PGP Public Key ID: 0x63546533