IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [perpass] Tiny stacks

Richard Barnes <rlb@ipv.sx> Mon, 09 December 2013 20:04 UTC

Return-Path: <rlb@ipv.sx>
X-Original-To: perpass@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: perpass@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 875971AE284 for <perpass@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Dec 2013 12:04:31 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.977
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.977 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yqQJR3WrgURA for <perpass@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Dec 2013 12:04:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-oa0-f53.google.com (mail-oa0-f53.google.com [209.85.219.53]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD0EC1ADFB2 for <perpass@ietf.org>; Mon, 9 Dec 2013 12:04:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-oa0-f53.google.com with SMTP id m1so4490354oag.12 for <perpass@ietf.org>; Mon, 09 Dec 2013 12:04:25 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=hDmhDbBRHm713S+G+/6XzABcbODBDgWysbU/nzAZ6hU=; b=Rjpqb0GPt5GnFaqk6cQNtikpM/xg/aocJzG3/KChbYCLFpZmU74UTChBhMrs0MstqV EQMFFD6DA34ZU1ASmF7FqqvvEFBwIcg15hspccqtM/bEQZra4zfQvZ8WkvOg6oSsmPQV Exm977J+Cxqlb6K1IuP7AT1nsOPNckbeyUSNl8TTnYBPo234cPXmAIhaQGUpauOfICIB AY9TgqY481x2SRcbxdoscgMw2ej90p0Ge05Gm8JBQLF3t0EedxskkQ0jh0RDfj/Wccwb IoffLxozczHF7Umff+PnE78ZVTXAavuAzHA5psHfhPopTkb4TxfMHDwUWS0pc03QVWtB ukTw==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmihXM6K7PHCidX8DxMPTbVN1qkqHGgkGrzulG2lNG7mg2tqGmZ7oNDP6Si8k3PwyPqAhm8
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.60.150.238 with SMTP id ul14mr14042993oeb.28.1386619464933; Mon, 09 Dec 2013 12:04:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.60.31.74 with HTTP; Mon, 9 Dec 2013 12:04:24 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <52A61E4C.6020403@gmail.com>
References: <290E20B455C66743BE178C5C84F1240847E5103799@EXMB01CMS.surrey.ac.uk> <2C66A416-5F07-4803-A4C0-BB61734BA42E@nominum.com> <290E20B455C66743BE178C5C84F1240847E510379A@EXMB01CMS.surrey.ac.uk> <529F7690.2050302@gmx.net> <290E20B455C66743BE178C5C84F1240847E510379C@EXMB01CMS.surrey.ac.uk> <52A1BBBC.9090509@cs.tcd.ie> <290E20B455C66743BE178C5C84F1240847E510379D@EXMB01CMS.surrey.ac.uk> <52A4D7D9.9000603@cs.tcd.ie> <52A4E412.4030804@gmail.com> <72B86100-E73E-46BD-ABD6-8E35D56DBDDA@cisco.com> <52A61E4C.6020403@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 09 Dec 2013 15:04:24 -0500
Message-ID: <CAL02cgR4T=HdKq64Fq6pJWezp=_20iL8jB+knJoid=LUjDKpWg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Richard Barnes <rlb@ipv.sx>
To: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="047d7b5d35b8a572a504ed1f80fb"
Cc: perpass <perpass@ietf.org>, "Stewart Bryant (stbryant)" <stbryant@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: [perpass] Tiny stacks
X-BeenThere: perpass@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "The perpass list is for IETF discussion of pervasive monitoring. " <perpass.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/perpass>, <mailto:perpass-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/perpass/>
List-Post: <mailto:perpass@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:perpass-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/perpass>, <mailto:perpass-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Dec 2013 20:04:31 -0000

On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 2:47 PM, Brian E Carpenter <
brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> wrote:

> On 09/12/2013 11:04, Stewart Bryant (stbryant) wrote:
> (on a different list and under a differeny Subject header)
> ...
>
> > Remembering of course that some platforms which wish
> > to use the Internet simply do not have the capability for
> > other than a very tiny very basic stack.
> >
> > I always use the PIC and the Arduino to remind myself what the
> > lower end of the franchise looks like.
>
> It seems to me that perpass should think a little bit about
> privacy and anti-surveillance issues for devices with tiny
> stacks, and see if that calls for any specific IETF work items.
>

This is not unexplored territory.
<http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-core-coap-18>
<http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-aks-crypto-sensors-02>
<http://tools.ietf.org/wg/dice/>




>
>     Brian
> _______________________________________________
> perpass mailing list
> perpass@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/perpass
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email