IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [perpass] Commnets on draft-farrell-perpass-attack-00 was RE: perens-perpass-appropriate-response-01

Bruce Perens <bruce@perens.com> Wed, 04 December 2013 22:52 UTC

Return-Path: <bruce@perens.com>
X-Original-To: perpass@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: perpass@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D2991AE16F for <perpass@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Dec 2013 14:52:05 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.177
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.177 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_HTML_ONLY=0.723, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id u-L0nx-42dDV for <perpass@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Dec 2013 14:52:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from alchemy.perens.com (alchemy.perens.com [206.221.219.26]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 135911ADBCA for <perpass@ietf.org>; Wed, 4 Dec 2013 14:52:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.18.131] (mail.a10networks.com [12.207.16.167]) by alchemy.perens.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 298C750008A for <perpass@ietf.org>; Wed, 4 Dec 2013 14:52:02 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <529FB216.7010504@perens.com>
Date: Wed, 04 Dec 2013 14:52:06 -0800
From: Bruce Perens <bruce@perens.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20131103 Icedove/17.0.10
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: perpass@ietf.org
References: <290E20B455C66743BE178C5C84F1240847E5103799@EXMB01CMS.surrey.ac.uk> <2C66A416-5F07-4803-A4C0-BB61734BA42E@nominum.com>
In-Reply-To: <2C66A416-5F07-4803-A4C0-BB61734BA42E@nominum.com>
Content-Type: text/html; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [perpass] Commnets on draft-farrell-perpass-attack-00 was RE: perens-perpass-appropriate-response-01
X-BeenThere: perpass@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "The perpass list is for IETF discussion of pervasive monitoring. " <perpass.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/perpass>, <mailto:perpass-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/perpass/>
List-Post: <mailto:perpass@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:perpass-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/perpass>, <mailto:perpass-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Dec 2013 22:52:05 -0000

On 12/04/2013 02:42 PM, Ted Lemon wrote:
I take it you haven't been reading the responses to Bruce's essay, or you would have seen that these points have already been discussed and refuted.
That might have been an accurate statement if this were a technical discussion rather than a political one. We saw opposing viewpoints. Opposition isn't refutation.

    Thanks

    Bruce

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email