Re: IAHC archive [was Re: Comments on gTLD-MOU Leadership [was: Bob shaws misrepresentation of Jeff williams's comments]]

[Jay Fenello <[e-mail]>]

[with apologies to IETF members . . .]

Hi Perry,

It's nice to hear from you again!

Based on your tone, it looks like  
I have hit a nerve ;-)

Is there something in those missing
archives that frightens you?

Jay.


At 09:32 AM 5/14/98 -0400, Perry E. Metzger wrote:
>
>I wonder if I should put up the archive of the tcpdump of Jay's
>machines being used by Eugene Kashpureff to try to exploit bugs in
>BIND to force my machines to resolve their fraudulent TLDs.
>
>Nah. That would only be resurrecting an episode we all want to
>forget. After all, its best if the thugs look like upstanding
>citizens.
>
>Is Eugene out of jail now, btw? I've stopped following the news carefully.
>
>Perry
>
>"Donald E. Eastlake 3rd" writes:
>> On Tue, 12 May 1998, Jay Fenello wrote:
>> 
>> > Date: Tue, 12 May 1998 13:02:48 -0400
>> > From: Jay Fenello <[e-mail]>
>> > Subject: Re: Comments on gTLD-MOU Leadership [was: Bob shaws  misrepresenta
>tion of Jeff williams's comments]
>> > 
>> > ...
>> > 
>> > If you are interested, there is semi-complete
>> > summary of the email archives and the Postel
>> > drafts at:
>> > 	http://www.newdom.com/archive/
>> > 
>> > I used the term semi-complete, because there
>> > is a mysterious gap in the historical record.
>> > It appears that the entire IAHC email archives,
>> > *and* the corresponding Newdom email archives
>> > are missing :-(
>> 
>> The IAHC mailing list archives are, not very suprisingly, on the IAHC site
>> at <http://www.iahc.org/iahc-discuss>.


At 01:58 AM 5/14/98 -0400, Jay Fenello wrote:
>
>Hi Donald,
>
>Thanks for the update.
>
>Here's what remains missing . . .
>
> >Two significnt events are missing with the lost [e-mail] 
> >files: 1) Postel announcing formation of the IAHC committee
> >and 2) community reaction to 1). 
> >
> >Also minor things like when Shaw called GTE Federal Systems
> >and was busted.
>
>Does anyone know where these archives can be found?
>
>Thanks,
>
>Jay.