Re: Last Call: SMTP Message Submission to Proposed Standard
Dave Crocker <dcrocker@brandenburg.com> Mon, 11 May 1998 19:40 UTC
Delivery-Date: Mon, 11 May 1998 15:49:27 -0400
Return-Path: cclark
Received: (from adm@localhost) by ietf.org (8.8.5/8.8.7a) id PAA25931 for ietf-outbound.10@ietf.org; Mon, 11 May 1998 15:40:02 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from baygate.bayarea.net (root@baygate.bayarea.net [204.71.212.2]) by ietf.org (8.8.5/8.8.7a) with ESMTP id PAA25859 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 11 May 1998 15:35:24 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from dcrocker@localhost) by baygate.bayarea.net (8.8.5/8.8.5) id MAA10351; Mon, 11 May 1998 12:35:14 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <199805111935.MAA10351@baygate.bayarea.net>
X-Sender: dcrocker@mail.bayarea.net
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.0.1.329 (Beta)
Date: Mon, 11 May 1998 12:34:29 -0700
To: perry@piermont.com
From: Dave Crocker <dcrocker@brandenburg.com>
Subject: Re: Last Call: SMTP Message Submission to Proposed Standard
Cc: Jack De Winter <jack@wildbear.on.ca>, ietf-submit@IMC.ORG, ietf@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <199805111541.LAA25301@jekyll.piermont.com>
References: <Your message of "Mon, 11 May 1998 10:48:49 EDT." <3.0.1.32.19980511104849.0097f9d0@lacroix.wildbear.on.ca>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
At 11:41 AM 5/11/98 -0400, Perry E. Metzger wrote: >You know, somehow I've been surviving with SMTP for this for years, >and it works well for myself and my users. I really am not certain why >this sudden critical need has arrived. Perhaps the hundreds of >thousands of people using SMTP for this purpose are mistaken and only >*think* it works. The need is not "sudden". The topic was under discussion for quite awhile, as in a couple/few years. The need HAS been made MORE urgent by the onset of spam problems and the need to treat submission markedly different from relaying. You know, the Arpanet went 10 years without a special posting protocol for mail, instead using an adjunct command for file transfer. But the net grows and demands change. So we created SMTP. It's now time to create a distinct posting service and to create it as simply as possible. Instantiating SMTP on a separate port and with some very explicit statements about the strictures at the server, distinguishing relay processing from submission processing, is the easiest way for us to accomplish this. d/ _________________________________________________________________________ Dave Crocker Brandenburg Consulting +1 408 246 8253 dcrocker@brandenburg.com 675 Spruce Drive (f) +1 408 273 6464 www.brandenburg.com Sunnyvale, CA 94086 USA
- Re: Last Call: SMTP Message Submission to Propose… Dave Crocker
- Re: Last Call: SMTP Message Submission to Propose… Lyndon Nerenberg
- Re: Last Call: SMTP Message Submission to Propose… Dave Crocker
- Re: Last Call: SMTP Message Submission to Propose… Perry E. Metzger
- Re: Last Call: SMTP Message Submission to Propose… Dave Crocker
- Re: Last Call: SMTP Message Submission to Propose… Perry E. Metzger
- Re: Last Call: SMTP Message Submission to Propose… Dave Crocker
- Re: Last Call: SMTP Message Submission to Propose… Jack De Winter