IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [pim] AD Review of draft-ietf-pim-explicit-rpf-vector-06

"Alvaro Retana (aretana)" <aretana@cisco.com> Fri, 06 November 2015 01:04 UTC

Return-Path: <aretana@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: pim@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pim@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A849B1A89C7; Thu, 5 Nov 2015 17:04:04 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.511
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.511 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4Mle8Xdxyv8b; Thu, 5 Nov 2015 17:04:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rcdn-iport-3.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-3.cisco.com [173.37.86.74]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 73FAA1A89A9; Thu, 5 Nov 2015 17:04:03 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=774; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1446771843; x=1447981443; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=v/FgkmC0A0jaPokKiTB8BvWsdpnjpEV8A3CIZBzPdRw=; b=L+7yOkC3ZF0BGrA+M+SZSHpVz5PEnYJNGOJWmAweELH40TqYZYyg7ey9 RgObgyCMsWFdArGE5XX8wNxds9WLYcIqNy5zUVGzenJsRRR7QnLZaXWHW y0vkiQJuxEp25lHNVD3H8OuspV9wqmILHOHr3OrXCjYdj9zI2R6W9zKm9 o=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0D0AQDl+ztW/4cNJK1egzuBQga+AwENgV+GEAKBPTgUAQEBAQEBAYEKhDYBAQQ6PxACAQg2EDIlAgQOBYguwS8BAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEbhlQBhH2JOQEEkmeDYQGNIpxBAR8BAUKEBHKEGIEHAQEB
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.20,249,1444694400"; d="scan'208";a="47889690"
Received: from alln-core-2.cisco.com ([173.36.13.135]) by rcdn-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP; 06 Nov 2015 01:04:00 +0000
Received: from XCH-ALN-002.cisco.com (xch-aln-002.cisco.com [173.36.7.12]) by alln-core-2.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id tA6140WF017687 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Fri, 6 Nov 2015 01:04:00 GMT
Received: from xch-aln-002.cisco.com (173.36.7.12) by XCH-ALN-002.cisco.com (173.36.7.12) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1104.5; Thu, 5 Nov 2015 19:03:59 -0600
Received: from xch-aln-002.cisco.com ([173.36.7.12]) by XCH-ALN-002.cisco.com ([173.36.7.12]) with mapi id 15.00.1104.000; Thu, 5 Nov 2015 19:03:59 -0600
From: "Alvaro Retana (aretana)" <aretana@cisco.com>
To: Stig Venaas <stig@venaas.com>
Thread-Topic: AD Review of draft-ietf-pim-explicit-rpf-vector-06
Thread-Index: AQHRARViSI1V4VTqsU2ooCLfzKJFqJ6OvZeAgACZtgA=
Date: Fri, 06 Nov 2015 01:03:59 +0000
Message-ID: <D2622B47.E86D2%aretana@cisco.com>
References: <D239907B.D7D75%aretana@cisco.com> <1445897287704.60786@cisco.com> <D255048B.E6306%aretana@cisco.com> <1448310480492.34744@cisco.com> <FE62691C-EA0B-449B-A348-65679A9C06F9@cisco.com> <1446056897910.60352@cisco.com> <D2569315.E69D5%aretana@cisco.com> <CAHANBtK9e-aASfJz=ZjX6oy+RDjU+D4bExWFb3T3gNwb=Gw6cQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAHANBtK9e-aASfJz=ZjX6oy+RDjU+D4bExWFb3T3gNwb=Gw6cQ@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.70.231.157]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <823CB9A1AA38624C9CFD5FF16D09B17D@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pim/1Lezugaq2iHPB55hcxhZx9EnN-0>
Cc: "draft-ietf-pim-explicit-rpf-vector@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-pim-explicit-rpf-vector@ietf.org>, "pim-chairs@ietf.org" <pim-chairs@ietf.org>, "mmcbride7@gmail.com" <mmcbride7@gmail.com>, "pim@ietf.org" <pim@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [pim] AD Review of draft-ietf-pim-explicit-rpf-vector-06
X-BeenThere: pim@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Protocol Independent Multicast <pim.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pim>, <mailto:pim-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pim/>
List-Post: <mailto:pim@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pim-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pim>, <mailto:pim-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Nov 2015 01:04:04 -0000

On 11/6/15, 9:53 AM, "Stig Venaas" <stig@venaas.com> wrote:

>I suggest adding text saying that this should be used within a single
>management domain so that one cannot inject explicit RPF attributes
>from the outside. Also suggest that if a router finds that it cannot
>use the vector list due to the next hop not being a PIM neighbor, it
>may log an error. Also maybe log if it is overridden due to downstream
>routers specifying different lists.
>
>Would this address the security and operational concerns?

I would definitely help, thanks!

I think we're going down the right path.  I obviously need to see the
final text before saying yes.  I would be happy to review before an
updated draft is submitted if that makes it better.

Thanks!

Alvaro.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email