IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [pim] AD Review of draft-ietf-pim-explicit-rpf-vector-06

Stig Venaas <stig@venaas.com> Tue, 27 October 2015 16:02 UTC

Return-Path: <stig@venaas.com>
X-Original-To: pim@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pim@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01E451A913E for <pim@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 27 Oct 2015 09:02:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.278
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.278 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ak_XagtSfHDm for <pim@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 27 Oct 2015 09:02:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lb0-x230.google.com (mail-lb0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c04::230]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E2AD01A9139 for <pim@ietf.org>; Tue, 27 Oct 2015 09:02:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by lbbwb3 with SMTP id wb3so67251530lbb.1 for <pim@ietf.org>; Tue, 27 Oct 2015 09:02:18 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=venaas_com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=4G5Fz2LRKhE+0i8z+UcuFT/GvAtDgp7PweQ6ku8HV5g=; b=Lp/xW3g5s9beE2+JoDqPcCCkvoySMBWTi8H1TRgPPAS/qXTkI9d6LHQYFLQDcsquvk nM0XuGzai0nIs8o0xDx0418A47K20WNKx3PDGI56NnmS+HwkEo9/zXAhGEy2Mpe2ow0U 97eD42F5HWJk8J+W3k9TWrofyZ5FTJO1UWzdCPiKSpupOkJBYpoDIQp1XCAE/5ijcwNK nf92dvyRdGJKX4zOt/OOESOIOV0hN0XUc1f3QUwzMOkhroi97KaXmZW7aKnD7Pymd1kb Q5k8YL7bwv2suhvwW3XQmnUdRPOw1W5pTLxGolzVxBVdLn6ua+Ld8GDhwshzEAR0Q3FA kudg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=4G5Fz2LRKhE+0i8z+UcuFT/GvAtDgp7PweQ6ku8HV5g=; b=YfSbK10i9M6IXq6WX9ARXLVLU+afmW30yZKsCpsKP7W0vkagT0lJFxegFMk2VWXBpg WeoTaPAxUHh8N5Ya50W+Ut+7Tgi4kOg87SgaixQJxgbRLvLDOJ5YKIoXIfzkgm4vA9gu 933i4ukrLszkix/YYUocf0DjmR9ieomxkpVxaFkV7rzJ/qTFzHW4KivRqqjzKx0epCYi SYJLuaQfuKpkwIwkVtp+XhcwYdMuLhGzBorZXHFc9+/6i8ltx3qbFHvsGfmBQ6YyqSuL hncm5RajByHTfo9OX7Htn6YNia0sSP9SJwArEOGp7tjNTTh5uStnifTQG8GM4GgW+9Sp 2T9g==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlHxfK5xvMumu7EYpy6A04qZAEhV8UQFM78OPU8kWSnR0AH49TIaxdTKPrtN3zII49YxGrS
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.112.189.193 with SMTP id gk1mr11096144lbc.98.1445961737955; Tue, 27 Oct 2015 09:02:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.25.42.19 with HTTP; Tue, 27 Oct 2015 09:02:17 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <D254FF4B.E62EA%aretana@cisco.com>
References: <D239907B.D7D75%aretana@cisco.com> <CAHANBtL2qESkhkQOSZZ4SatkYXh9RhaD=FduPpp36sp1w+08sw@mail.gmail.com> <D254FF4B.E62EA%aretana@cisco.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2015 09:02:17 -0700
Message-ID: <CAHANBtLwujsndDZMYq0XT5Xd1DTG38tv4S0eSkG+U=-m2jm-YA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Stig Venaas <stig@venaas.com>
To: "Alvaro Retana (aretana)" <aretana@cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pim/XOGXdXytAIFvhhJEu8AB-w8y1_4>
Cc: "draft-ietf-pim-explicit-rpf-vector@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-pim-explicit-rpf-vector@ietf.org>, "mmcbride7@gmail.com" <mmcbride7@gmail.com>, "pim-chairs@ietf.org" <pim-chairs@ietf.org>, "pim@ietf.org" <pim@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [pim] AD Review of draft-ietf-pim-explicit-rpf-vector-06
X-BeenThere: pim@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Protocol Independent Multicast <pim.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pim>, <mailto:pim-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pim/>
List-Post: <mailto:pim@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pim-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pim>, <mailto:pim-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2015 16:02:21 -0000

Hi

I agree. We'll do a status update at the upcoming meeting and mention
the status in particular.

Stig


On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 8:04 AM, Alvaro Retana (aretana)
<aretana@cisco.com> wrote:
> On 10/26/15, 6:43 PM, "Stig Venaas" <stig@venaas.com> wrote:
>
> Stig:
>
> Hi!
>
>>Finally - I really don't see this as being informational.  Either it's
>>experimental or, since the chairs believe that it has WG consensus, it is
>>standards track.
>>
>>That's what I can find so far. Can the authors please help do some
>>digging, or do you remember? You remember Mike?
>
> I am usually not too comfortable with the change of status in the middle
> of a set of review comments -- mostly because I don't think the WG might
> be paying attention (in general, not specific to pim).  [Note: I'm saying
> that now as a test. ;-) ]
>
> Mike did send a WGLC message [1] for -06, which already had the "Standards
> Track" status in it.  While I didn't see any reply to that, I am ok as
> long as the history is somehow reflected in the Shepherd's writeup.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Alvaro.
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email