IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [pim] AD Review of draft-ietf-pim-explicit-rpf-vector-06

"Alvaro Retana (aretana)" <aretana@cisco.com> Wed, 18 November 2015 22:30 UTC

Return-Path: <aretana@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: pim@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pim@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15BDC1B3282; Wed, 18 Nov 2015 14:30:49 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -15.086
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.086 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.585, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lDo2EkAzCEXI; Wed, 18 Nov 2015 14:30:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rcdn-iport-8.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-8.cisco.com [173.37.86.79]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C1D531B327C; Wed, 18 Nov 2015 14:30:47 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1099; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1447885847; x=1449095447; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=woMki2F1Ax0hHD4+IYQcUsAoAgKT+JxpbikRPuIN+38=; b=b1DsPGMzQoosaAWrSvyPvE2B06IWuz4P7H7FAEChWSCvg3ISRDkC/fBU o0ZcJxALrh5VPgDMFkps4ZmBV4eU1TlMTwTkP5NuYvzOEElLCON97fLTD JKaAcrA9z49LQ2GVW/8aBDa9gRgjny4JpVHMC4y0i7HHkeEOR3jH9FXOB U=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0ALAgB7+0xW/49dJa1egzuBQga+YgENgWWGDwKBSTgUAQEBAQEBAX8LhDUBAQQ6PxACAQgYHhAyJQIEDgWILr84AQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBARqGVAGEfYk5AQSFTY0bg2IBinKCOIFbhECNVohTAR8BAUKCER2BVnKEGYEHAQEB
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.20,315,1444694400"; d="scan'208";a="46260607"
Received: from rcdn-core-7.cisco.com ([173.37.93.143]) by rcdn-iport-8.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 18 Nov 2015 22:30:46 +0000
Received: from XCH-ALN-002.cisco.com (xch-aln-002.cisco.com [173.36.7.12]) by rcdn-core-7.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id tAIMUkCc019623 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Wed, 18 Nov 2015 22:30:46 GMT
Received: from xch-aln-002.cisco.com (173.36.7.12) by XCH-ALN-002.cisco.com (173.36.7.12) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1104.5; Wed, 18 Nov 2015 16:30:46 -0600
Received: from xch-aln-002.cisco.com ([173.36.7.12]) by XCH-ALN-002.cisco.com ([173.36.7.12]) with mapi id 15.00.1104.000; Wed, 18 Nov 2015 16:30:46 -0600
From: "Alvaro Retana (aretana)" <aretana@cisco.com>
To: "mmcbride7@gmail.com" <mmcbride7@gmail.com>
Thread-Topic: AD Review of draft-ietf-pim-explicit-rpf-vector-06
Thread-Index: AQHRARViSI1V4VTqsU2ooCLfzKJFqJ5+0P2AgADE1YCAIxpJgA==
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2015 22:30:46 +0000
Message-ID: <D2726607.EACF6%aretana@cisco.com>
References: <D239907B.D7D75%aretana@cisco.com> <CAHANBtL2qESkhkQOSZZ4SatkYXh9RhaD=FduPpp36sp1w+08sw@mail.gmail.com> <D254FF4B.E62EA%aretana@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <D254FF4B.E62EA%aretana@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.117.15.3]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <8EAC97B18E7EE24EA5BF447FDDA3A8A8@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pim/t_3Vz4Y5swGwj7Pvw145oeasbhc>
Cc: "draft-ietf-pim-explicit-rpf-vector@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-pim-explicit-rpf-vector@ietf.org>, "pim-chairs@ietf.org" <pim-chairs@ietf.org>, "pim@ietf.org" <pim@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [pim] AD Review of draft-ietf-pim-explicit-rpf-vector-06
X-BeenThere: pim@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Protocol Independent Multicast <pim.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pim>, <mailto:pim-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pim/>
List-Post: <mailto:pim@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pim-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pim>, <mailto:pim-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2015 22:30:49 -0000

Mike:

Hi!

I need you to please update the Shepherd's writeup so we can start the
IETF Last Call.

Thanks!

Alvaro.

On 10/27/15, 11:04 AM, "Alvaro Retana (aretana)" <aretana@cisco.com> wrote:

>On 10/26/15, 6:43 PM, "Stig Venaas" <stig@venaas.com> wrote:
>
>Stig:
>
>Hi!
>
>>Finally - I really don't see this as being informational.  Either it's
>>experimental or, since the chairs believe that it has WG consensus, it is
>>standards track.
>>
>>That's what I can find so far. Can the authors please help do some
>>digging, or do you remember? You remember Mike?
>
>I am usually not too comfortable with the change of status in the middle
>of a set of review comments -- mostly because I don't think the WG might
>be paying attention (in general, not specific to pim).  [Note: I'm saying
>that now as a test. ;-) ]
>
>Mike did send a WGLC message [1] for -06, which already had the "Standards
>Track" status in it.  While I didn't see any reply to that, I am ok as
>long as the history is somehow reflected in the Shepherd's writeup.
>
>Thanks!
>
>Alvaro.
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email