[pkix] Fwd: RFC 5742 review of draft-hotz-kx509

Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie> Wed, 06 June 2012 11:30 UTC

Return-Path: <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
X-Original-To: pkix@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pkix@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF07A21F8755 for <pkix@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 6 Jun 2012 04:30:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.567
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.567 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.032, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BaUP7QWLltG1 for <pkix@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 6 Jun 2012 04:30:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from scss.tcd.ie (hermes.scss.tcd.ie [IPv6:2001:770:10:200:889f:cdff:fe8d:ccd2]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F27421F87FF for <pkix@ietf.org>; Wed, 6 Jun 2012 04:30:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hermes.scss.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4C3E18F387 for <pkix@ietf.org>; Wed, 6 Jun 2012 12:30:55 +0100 (IST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cs.tcd.ie; h= content-transfer-encoding:content-type:in-reply-to:references :subject:mime-version:user-agent:from:date:message-id:received :received:x-virus-scanned; s=cs; t=1338982255; bh=DwMwh5a0e22Bed E/W99AIS8EZo1Vv/XEIv/a7xl35es=; b=40jV8XiXxaIre5FZea9/XEXRPFgmm4 hGZPlLAjMLXaev07d/+I8v60q/w1TgFVAKtgJJv15gXVt6iAOGXwZapt6g8nCi7M HJ69aewiZ+5u/neDlxhyLudObBs8RJBFi1j9WLyQtb1UMJyNtMdA0I3aAHzOHjUn XzfUQf/vx088Ay9CFeTI+LGCWPUDc2WuiIVyWslrPB1vGmr0j4MDnr4iBao3s6bn U3uERFX19rK5nc/lcSfiTj/rszof5/QMkspnFmxvj9cEWOv7KR3bbu4CftSMwJQ5 zGM7qU6FEXmiww2KTMKB0ECoO5tBa8EJ5opqV62R885ViWY5Rxp2T5sw==
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at scss.tcd.ie
Received: from scss.tcd.ie ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (scss.tcd.ie [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10027) with ESMTP id 35U+-zk7cwjS for <pkix@ietf.org>; Wed, 6 Jun 2012 12:30:55 +0100 (IST)
Received: from [IPv6:2001:770:10:203:bd88:d721:7222:9395] (unknown [IPv6:2001:770:10:203:bd88:d721:7222:9395]) by smtp.scss.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6569916F4BC for <pkix@ietf.org>; Wed, 6 Jun 2012 12:30:55 +0100 (IST)
Message-ID: <4FCF3F70.5000807@cs.tcd.ie>
Date: Wed, 06 Jun 2012 12:30:56 +0100
From: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120430 Thunderbird/12.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: pkix <pkix@ietf.org>
References: <4FCF3F47.10205@cs.tcd.ie>
In-Reply-To: <4FCF3F47.10205@cs.tcd.ie>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.2
X-Forwarded-Message-Id: <4FCF3F47.10205@cs.tcd.ie>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: [pkix] Fwd: RFC 5742 review of draft-hotz-kx509
X-BeenThere: pkix@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: PKIX Working Group <pkix.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pkix>, <mailto:pkix-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/pkix>
List-Post: <mailto:pkix@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pkix-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pkix>, <mailto:pkix-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Jun 2012 11:30:57 -0000

FYI

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: RFC 5742 review of draft-hotz-kx509
Date: Wed, 06 Jun 2012 12:30:15 +0100
From: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
To: Russ Allbery <rra@stanford.edu>, draft-hotz-kx509@tools.ietf.org,
Nevil Brownlee <rfc-ise@rfc-editor.org>
CC: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>


Hi,

I've done my 5742 review of this and reckon that its doesn't
conflict with the planned work on the topic in the kerberos
WG, so I've put this on the June 21st IESG telechat agenda
for the other ADs to see if they agree or not.

Note that I also had some comments on the text itself. [1]
The authors/ISE might want to take a look at those in the
meantime, in particular the IANA registration comment.
(Authors - I think the right thing here is to do what the
ISE wants in terms of any possible revisions, but from
the IESG point of view, I'd guess changes you might want
to make to address those comments if made in the next week
wouldn't be a problem.)

Cheers,
Stephen.

[1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-hotz-kx509/writeup/

On 05/31/2012 12:35 AM, Stephen Farrell wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> The independent submissions editor (ISE) has asked the
> IESG to do an RFC 5742 review of this [1] document.
> 
> That review is to check that the publication of this
> independent stream submission would not conflict with
> IETF work.
> 
> In this case, the work is clearly related to the pkix
> and kerberos working groups, hence this mail.
> 
> Note: this mail is not a request for a technical review
> of the content, but rather asking if publication would
> somehow be damaging to the work of these wgs. (If you
> do have technical comments, send them to the author
> or ISE). If you're not sure about any of that, then
> read RFC 5742. [2]
> 
> I'll take silence as meaning that nobody thinks that
> there's a conflict. If someone thinks there is a
> conflict let me, the list, or the wg chairs know. In
> due course, I'll be doing my own evaluation as well
> of course, as will other IESG members.
> 
> Thanks,
> Stephen.
> 
> [1] http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-hotz-kx509-04
> [2] http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5742
> 
> _______________________________________________
> pkix mailing list
> pkix@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pkix
> 
>