IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [pkix] [Ietf-krb-wg] RFC 5742 review of draft-hotz-kx509

Sam Hartman <hartmans-ietf@mit.edu> Fri, 01 June 2012 21:22 UTC

Return-Path: <hartmans@mit.edu>
X-Original-To: pkix@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pkix@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 275E821F889E for <pkix@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 1 Jun 2012 14:22:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.168
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.168 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.903, BAYES_00=-2.599, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id v1pqRZoNnwlL for <pkix@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 1 Jun 2012 14:22:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from permutation-city.suchdamage.org (permutation-city.suchdamage.org [69.25.196.28]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1735921F889D for <pkix@ietf.org>; Fri, 1 Jun 2012 14:22:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from carter-zimmerman.suchdamage.org (carter-zimmerman.suchdamage.org [69.25.196.178]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "laptop", Issuer "laptop" (not verified)) by mail.suchdamage.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C3AE4202D8; Fri, 1 Jun 2012 17:22:13 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by carter-zimmerman.suchdamage.org (Postfix, from userid 8042) id BC5F24151; Fri, 1 Jun 2012 17:22:14 -0400 (EDT)
From: Sam Hartman <hartmans-ietf@mit.edu>
To: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
References: <4FC6AEDA.4010709@cs.tcd.ie>
Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2012 17:22:14 -0400
In-Reply-To: <4FC6AEDA.4010709@cs.tcd.ie> (Stephen Farrell's message of "Thu, 31 May 2012 00:35:54 +0100")
Message-ID: <tslk3zqhgmx.fsf@mit.edu>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.110009 (No Gnus v0.9) Emacs/22.3 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Cc: pkix <pkix@ietf.org>, "krb-wg mailing list (ietf-krb-wg@lists.anl.gov)" <ietf-krb-wg@lists.anl.gov>
Subject: Re: [pkix] [Ietf-krb-wg] RFC 5742 review of draft-hotz-kx509
X-BeenThere: pkix@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: PKIX Working Group <pkix.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pkix>, <mailto:pkix-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/pkix>
List-Post: <mailto:pkix@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pkix-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pkix>, <mailto:pkix-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2012 21:22:21 -0000

>>>>> "Stephen" == Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie> writes:


Hi.  I believe that this issue has been discussion in the Kerberos
working group and we asked the author to document the existing KX509
protocol and publish that so we'd have a historical record of what is
done today.  It's likely we'll do work in this space in the future but
it's our desire that work be informed by an existing historical record
and the current draft will help us with that.

So, with my chair hat on, I believe this has already been discussed in
Kerberos and we support publication. Which is to say, no conflict here.

    Stephen> I'll take silence as meaning that nobody thinks that
    Stephen> there's a conflict. If someone thinks there is a conflict
    Stephen> let me, the list, or the wg chairs know. In due course,
    Stephen> I'll be doing my own evaluation as well of course, as will
    Stephen> other IESG members.

    Stephen> Thanks, Stephen.

    Stephen> [1] http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-hotz-kx509-04 [2]
    Stephen> http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5742

    Stephen> _______________________________________________ ietf-krb-wg
    Stephen> mailing list ietf-krb-wg@lists.anl.gov
    Stephen> https://lists.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/ietf-krb-wg

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email