Re: Design Teams (was v 1.2, IETF material)

Fred Baker <fbaker@acc.com> Tue, 01 December 1992 21:49 UTC

Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa10463; 1 Dec 92 16:49 EST
Received: from CNRI.RESTON.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa10452; 1 Dec 92 16:49 EST
Received: from ietf.cnri.reston.va.us by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa25311; 1 Dec 92 16:50 EST
Received: from CNRI.RESTON.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa10416; 1 Dec 92 16:49 EST
Received: from SAFFRON.ACC.COM by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa25153; 1 Dec 92 16:49 EST
Received: by saffron.acc.com (4.1/SMI-4.1) id AA08809; Tue, 1 Dec 92 13:49:09 PST
Date: Tue, 01 Dec 1992 13:49:09 -0800
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Fred Baker <fbaker@acc.com>
Message-Id: <9212012149.AA08809@saffron.acc.com>
To: poised@CNRI.Reston.VA.US, rlstewart@eng.xyplex.com
Subject: Re: Design Teams (was v 1.2, IETF material)

>> The only solution I see is what I'm doing: everything I can to be
>> open and fair while maintaining consensus-based quality and getting
>> done in the time demanded.  I can only hope history will be kind.

I can't comment on history; it suffers from the fact of being written
by historians, the only interesting instances of which don't live in
the century they record.

However, should any of them ever peruse the archive, let it be noted
that the aspirations of the chair of the SNMPV2 WG have been noted and
appreciated by at least one observer present at the time.

Fred