Re: v 1.2, IETF material
Einar Stefferud <Stef@nma.com> Tue, 01 December 1992 22:18 UTC
Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa10909; 1 Dec 92 17:18 EST
Received: from CNRI.RESTON.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa10900; 1 Dec 92 17:18 EST
Received: from ietf.cnri.reston.va.us by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa26469; 1 Dec 92 17:19 EST
Received: from CNRI.RESTON.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa10895; 1 Dec 92 17:18 EST
Received: from ics.uci.edu by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa26454; 1 Dec 92 17:18 EST
Received: from nma.com by q2.ics.uci.edu id ab03166; 1 Dec 92 13:17 PST
Received: from localhost by odin.nma.com id aa19579; 1 Dec 92 12:19 PST
To: poised@CNRI.Reston.VA.US
Subject: Re: v 1.2, IETF material
In-reply-to: Your message of Tue, 01 Dec 1992 11:55:24 -0500. <9212011655.AA03948@xap.xyplex.com>
Reply-to: Stef@nma.com
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Einar Stefferud <Stef@nma.com>
Date: Tue, 01 Dec 1992 12:19:09 -0800
Message-ID: <19577.723241149@nma.com>
X-Orig-Sender: stef@nma.com
Bob and Dave --- I agree completely! } I agree. Not recognizing and allowing design teams dooms us to using them } under the table or doing everything by committee. Design teams must become recognized, et al. tools in the work of the IETF. By ducking the issue, we sew the seeds of making them entirely illigitimate and subject to discount as "under cover conspiracies". If the issue had never come up, we could afford to not openly address the issues, but now that they are on the table, they must be openly dealt with. To openly push them back under the table is the absolutely wrong thing to do now. It certainly does not say much if our "leaders" cannot even follow their noses. Best...\Stef
- v 1.2, IETF material Carl Malamud
- Change suggestion Re: v 1.2, IETF material Einar Stefferud
- Re: v 1.2, IETF material John C Klensin
- Re: v 1.2, IETF material Erik Huizer
- Re: v 1.2, IETF material Dave Crocker
- Re: v 1.2, IETF material Bob Stewart
- Re: v 1.2, IETF material John C Klensin
- Re: v 1.2, IETF material Barry M. Leiner
- Re: v 1.2, IETF material Frank Kastenholz
- Re: v 1.2, IETF material John C Klensin
- Re: Design Teams (was v 1.2, IETF material) Bob Stewart
- Re: v 1.2, IETF material Einar Stefferud
- Re: v 1.2, IETF material Dave Crocker
- Re: v 1.2, IETF material Einar Stefferud
- Re: v 1.2, IETF material Vinton G. Cerf
- Design Teams (was "v 1.2, IETF material") Gary Scott Malkin
- Re: Design Teams (was "v 1.2, IETF material") Dave Crocker
- Re: Design Teams (was "v 1.2, IETF material") Marshall Rose
- Re: Design Teams (was "v 1.2, IETF material") Bob Stewart
- Re: Design Teams (was "v 1.2, IETF material") John C Klensin
- Re: Design Teams (was "v 1.2, IETF material") Marshall Rose
- Design Teams (was "v 1.2, IETF material") Gary Scott Malkin
- Re: Design Teams (was "v 1.2, IETF material") Marshall Rose
- Re: v 1.2, IETF material Barry M. Leiner
- Re: v 1.2, IETF material Dave Crocker
- Re: v 1.2, IETF material Einar Stefferud
- Re: v 1.2, IETF material Beast (Donald E. Eastlake, 3rd)
- Re: v 1.2, IETF material Frank Kastenholz
- Re: v 1.2, IETF material Beast (Donald E. Eastlake, 3rd)
- Re: Design Teams (was "v 1.2, IETF material") James R. (Chuck) Davin
- Re: Design Teams (was "v 1.2, IETF material") John Curran
- Re: v 1.2, IETF material Einar Stefferud
- Re: v 1.2, IETF material Beast (Donald E. Eastlake, 3rd)
- Re: v 1.2, IETF material Vinton G. Cerf
- Re: v 1.2, IETF material Vinton G. Cerf
- Re: v 1.2, IETF material Beast (Donald E. Eastlake, 3rd)
- Re: v 1.2, IETF material Carl Malamud
- Re: v 1.2, IETF material Vinton G. Cerf
- Re: v 1.2, IETF material Einar Stefferud
- v 1.2, IETF material Gary Scott Malkin
- Re: Design Teams (was "v 1.2, IETF material") Bob Stewart
- Re: Design Teams (was "v 1.2, IETF material") Einar Stefferud
- Re: Design Teams (was "v 1.2, IETF material") Dave Crocker