IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: v 1.2, IETF material

Dave Crocker <dcrocker@mordor.stanford.edu> Wed, 02 December 1992 06:15 UTC

Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa14648; 2 Dec 92 1:15 EST
Received: from CNRI.RESTON.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa14639; 2 Dec 92 1:15 EST
Received: from ietf.cnri.reston.va.us by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa08801; 2 Dec 92 1:16 EST
Received: from CNRI.RESTON.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa14634; 2 Dec 92 1:15 EST
Received: from Mordor.Stanford.EDU by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa08796; 2 Dec 92 1:16 EST
Received: from localhost by Mordor.Stanford.EDU (5.65/inc-1.0) id AA12838; Tue, 1 Dec 92 22:16:13 -0800
Message-Id: <9212020616.AA12838@Mordor.Stanford.EDU>
To: "Barry M. Leiner" <leiner@nsipo.nasa.gov>
Cc: Erik Huizer <Erik.Huizer@surfnet.nl>, Carl Malamud <carl@malamud.com>, poised@CNRI.Reston.VA.US
Subject: Re: v 1.2, IETF material
Org: The Branch Office, Sunnyvale CA
Phone: +1 408 246 8253; fax: +1 408 249 6205
In-Reply-To: Your message of Tue, 01 Dec 92 12:28:59 -0800. <9212012029.AA01044@dscs.arc.nasa.gov>
Date: Tue, 01 Dec 1992 22:16:13 -0800
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Dave Crocker <dcrocker@mordor.stanford.edu>
X-Mts: smtp

Barry,

    Hence, we didn't really see the need to talk about design teams. It just
    appeared to be a place where we wind up overspecifying the system, and run
    the risk of putting our feet in our collective mouths, to boot.

And my point is that I think your (collective) view represents
reasonable theory and poor practise.  I've watched the reality of
unofficial/unacknowledged design teams constantly cause tension
and believe that this only will get solved by dealing with it
explicitly.

Dave

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email