IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: v 1.2, IETF material

"Barry M. Leiner" <leiner@nsipo.nasa.gov> Wed, 02 December 1992 22:39 UTC

Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa20828; 2 Dec 92 17:39 EST
Received: from CNRI.RESTON.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa20819; 2 Dec 92 17:39 EST
Received: from ietf.cnri.reston.va.us by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa27189; 2 Dec 92 17:40 EST
Received: from CNRI.RESTON.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa20814; 2 Dec 92 17:39 EST
Received: from dscs.arc.nasa.gov by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa27181; 2 Dec 92 17:40 EST
Received: Wed, 2 Dec 92 14:40:37 PST from localhost.arc.nasa.gov by dscs.arc.nasa.gov (4.1/1.5T)
Message-Id: <9212022240.AA16589@dscs.arc.nasa.gov>
To: Dave Crocker <dcrocker@mordor.stanford.edu>
Cc: Erik Huizer <Erik.Huizer@surfnet.nl>, Carl Malamud <carl@malamud.com>, poised@CNRI.Reston.VA.US
Subject: Re: v 1.2, IETF material
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 01 Dec 92 22:16:13 PST." <9212020616.AA12838@Mordor.Stanford.EDU>
Date: Wed, 02 Dec 1992 14:40:37 -0800
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: "Barry M. Leiner" <leiner@nsipo.nasa.gov>

Does the tension come from the unacknowledged existence of design teams or
the lack of a well-specified way for the WGs to deal with the proposals in
a fair manner?

Barry

> Return-Path: dcrocker@Mordor.Stanford.EDU
> Return-Path: <dcrocker@Mordor.Stanford.EDU>
> Received: Tue, 1 Dec 92 22:16:14 PST from Mordor.Stanford.EDU by
nsipo.arc.nasa.gov (4.1/1.5)
> Received: from localhost by Mordor.Stanford.EDU (5.65/inc-1.0)
> 	id AA12838; Tue, 1 Dec 92 22:16:13 -0800
> Message-Id: <9212020616.AA12838@Mordor.Stanford.EDU>
> To: Barry M. Leiner <leiner@nsipo.nasa.gov>
> Cc: Erik Huizer <Erik.Huizer@surfnet.nl>, Carl Malamud <carl@malamud.com>,
>         poised@cnri.reston.va.us
> Subject: Re: v 1.2, IETF material 
> Org: The Branch Office, Sunnyvale CA
> Phone: +1 408 246 8253; fax: +1 408 249 6205
> In-Reply-To: Your message of Tue, 01 Dec 92 12:28:59 -0800.         
<9212012029.AA01044@dscs.arc.nasa.gov> 
> Date: Tue, 01 Dec 92 22:16:13 -0800
> From: Dave Crocker <dcrocker@Mordor.Stanford.EDU>
> X-Mts: smtp
> 
> Barry,
> 
>     Hence, we didn't really see the need to talk about design teams. It just
>     appeared to be a place where we wind up overspecifying the system, and run
>     the risk of putting our feet in our collective mouths, to boot.
> 
> And my point is that I think your (collective) view represents
> reasonable theory and poor practise.  I've watched the reality of
> unofficial/unacknowledged design teams constantly cause tension
> and believe that this only will get solved by dealing with it
> explicitly.
> 
> Dave

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email