IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: v 1.2, IETF material

Einar Stefferud <Stef=poised@nma.com> Wed, 02 December 1992 11:12 UTC

Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa01034; 2 Dec 92 6:12 EST
Received: from CNRI.RESTON.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa01025; 2 Dec 92 6:12 EST
Received: from ietf.cnri.reston.va.us by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa03960; 2 Dec 92 6:13 EST
Received: from CNRI.RESTON.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa01020; 2 Dec 92 6:12 EST
Received: from ics.uci.edu by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa03950; 2 Dec 92 6:12 EST
Received: from nma.com by q2.ics.uci.edu id ab11688; 2 Dec 92 3:11 PST
Received: from localhost by odin.nma.com id aa21670; 2 Dec 92 3:05 PST
To: poised@CNRI.Reston.VA.US
Subject: Re: v 1.2, IETF material
In-reply-to: Your message of Tue, 01 Dec 1992 22:16:13 -0800. <9212020616.AA12838@Mordor.Stanford.EDU>
Reply-to: Stef=poised@nma.com
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Einar Stefferud <Stef=poised@nma.com>
Date: Wed, 02 Dec 1992 03:05:49 -0800
Message-ID: <21668.723294349@nma.com>
X-Orig-Sender: stef@nma.com

I agree fully with Dave on this Design Team issue.

The currrent situation is causing serious tensions and legitimizes
serious unwarranted attacks on the intergity of Design Team
participants, even when the Design Team output is clearly placed into
the WG for open discussion and modification.

Until Design Teams are made legitimate, we have a serious problem.

My own recent experiences in the SMTP-EXT WG are all the proof of this
that I need;-).  I will think again very carefully before I
participate in another Design Team effort in the interests of helping
a WG.  It very nearly made enemies of good friends!  

Anybody wanna see my scars?

However, the SMP spectacle is another that perhaps more of you have
noticed.

Best...\Stef

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email