IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: v 1.2, IETF material

Dave Crocker <dcrocker@mordor.stanford.edu> Wed, 02 December 1992 23:38 UTC

Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa21514; 2 Dec 92 18:38 EST
Received: from CNRI.RESTON.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa21499; 2 Dec 92 18:38 EST
Received: from ietf.cnri.reston.va.us by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa28893; 2 Dec 92 18:39 EST
Received: from CNRI.RESTON.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa21489; 2 Dec 92 18:38 EST
Received: from Mordor.Stanford.EDU by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa28888; 2 Dec 92 18:39 EST
Received: from localhost by Mordor.Stanford.EDU (5.65/inc-1.0) id AA09036; Wed, 2 Dec 92 15:39:37 -0800
Message-Id: <9212022339.AA09036@Mordor.Stanford.EDU>
To: "Barry M. Leiner" <leiner@nsipo.nasa.gov>
Cc: poised@CNRI.Reston.VA.US
Subject: Re: v 1.2, IETF material
Org: The Branch Office, Sunnyvale CA
Phone: +1 408 246 8253; fax: +1 408 249 6205
In-Reply-To: Your message of Wed, 02 Dec 92 14:40:37 -0800. <9212022240.AA16589@dscs.arc.nasa.gov>
Date: Wed, 02 Dec 1992 15:39:37 -0800
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Dave Crocker <dcrocker@mordor.stanford.edu>
X-Mts: smtp

Barry,

    Does the tension come from the unacknowledged existence of design teams or
    the lack of a well-specified way for the WGs to deal with the proposals in
    a fair manner?

Seems to vary.  Sometimes one; sometimes the other.  Sometimes both (and
more, I fear.)

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email