v 1.2, IETF material
Carl Malamud <carl@malamud.com> Sat, 28 November 1992 14:04 UTC
Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa01309; 28 Nov 92 9:04 EST
Received: from CNRI.RESTON.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa01298; 28 Nov 92 9:04 EST
Received: from ietf.cnri.reston.va.us by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa06636; 28 Nov 92 9:05 EST
Received: from CNRI.RESTON.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa01264; 28 Nov 92 9:04 EST
Received: from trystero.malamud.com by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa06590; 28 Nov 92 9:04 EST
Received: by malamud.com (4.1/SMI-4.1) id AA06965; Sat, 28 Nov 92 09:10:40 EST
Date: Sat, 28 Nov 1992 09:10:40 -0500
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Carl Malamud <carl@malamud.com>
Message-Id: <9211281410.AA06965@malamud.com>
To: poised@CNRI.Reston.VA.US
Subject: v 1.2, IETF material
Here is a new version of the materials presented at the IETF plenary. Lyman's slides have been added in and there have been a few changes made to the material I posted Monday. If/when we get consensus on this list, the next step is probably posting to the IETF list so everybody is clear what will be presented to the ISOC trustees on December 10. Carl Version 1.2, POISED Document Changes: Renumbered bullets to include the "introductory" bullet as n.1. Fixed various spelling and other nits. Added 2.7 allowing IESG or IAB to fill vacant slots but that slot is up at next regularly scheduled selection period. Added 2.8 specifying that nominating committee deliberations are confidential. Changed 4.3 to specify that Ombudsman may gather together several "cases" and must make good faith attempt to resolve cases. Changed 4.8 to specify that recall committee must explain its decision in writing. Added 4.10 to specify that if a member survives a recall, the Ombudsman creates at least a 6-month moratorium on further actions against that member. (This is meant to handle the potential for harassment ... remember that the person will be up for selection every two years so between selection and recall there is certainly ample accountability.) Added section 6 describing the changes that Lyman presented. STRUCTURAL CHANGES IN THE IAB and IESG 1. TWO-YEAR TERMS 1.1 Members of the IAB and IESG will serve two-year terms. The terms are staggered so approximately half of each body is selected each year. There are no term limits. 2. NOMINATING COMMITTEE 2.1 Selection shall be by a nominating committee. The nominating committee is formed for a particular round of selections and then disbands. This is not a standing committee. 2.2 The nominating committee is composed of seven members selected by lot from a list of volunteers who are willing to serve and have attended two or more IETFs. [Details on this procedure to follow.] 2.3 The chair of the nominating committee shall be the Executive Director of the Internet Society. The IAB and the IESG may each appoint one liaison. The chair and the liaisons are non-voting positions. 2.4 The nominating committee is responsible for recruiting nominees who are willing and able to serve. 2.5 The nominating committee may recommend a single name for a position, or, if unable to reach consensus on a single name, multiple names. 2.6 Selection of names shall be for a specific slot (e.g., "IAB Member" or "the Network Management Area Director of the IESG"). For purposes of this process, the Chair of the IETF is considered to be a specific slot. The Chair of the IAB, however, is not a specific slot and that position shall be selected by the IAB from among its members. 2.7 Both the IAB and the IESG may periodically change their composition to reflect the technical needs of the community. If a new slot is created or an existing slot becomes vacant on the IAB, the IAB may appoint an acting person to fill that slot but that slot shall then be subject to selection at the next regularly scheduled selection period. Likewise, the IESG may temporarily fill slots and those slots shall be subject to selection at the next regularly scheduled selection period. 2.8 The nominating committee may draw upon resources and advice from the community, but the committee shall keep all internal deliberations and personal data confidential. The committee members shall agree in writing that the confidentiality of their deliberations are preserved. 3. ADVICE AND CONSENT 3.1 The selections of the nominating committee are subject to advice and consent. 3.2 Positions on the IAB are subject to the advice and consent of the Internet Society trustees. The trustees may select one of the names presented to it or may reject all names. 3.3 Positions on the IESG or the Chair of the IETF are subject to the advice and consent of the IAB. The IAB may select one of the names presented to it or may reject all names. 3.4 Selectees shall give a talk at an IETF plenary soon after their selection. 4. OMBUDSMAN 4.1 The Internet Society shall appoint a standing ombudsman to resolve conflicts. 4.2 If a member of the IETF feels that a member of the IESG, the Chair of the IETF, or a member of the IAB is not carrying out his or her duties, the member of the IETF may present the situation to the Ombudsman. 4.3 The Ombudsman shall attempt to resolve the situation within a 90-day period. The Ombudsman may gather the complaints of several people together into a single case, but shall always make a good faith attempt to hear all complaints. 4.4 If the Ombudsman is unable to reach a resolution of the situation, a recall committee shall be formed to consider the case. 4.5 The recall committee is formed by lot from a list of volunteers who are willing to serve and have attended 2 or more IETFs. 4.6 The chair of the committee shall be the Executive Director of the Internet Society. The IAB and the IESG may each appoint a liaison. The chair and the liaisons are non-voting positions. 4.7 The committee shall investigate the situation in a thorough manner and examine all relevant facts. 4.8 If the committee decides by a vote of 2/3 or more, a recall has been decided upon. The committee shall publish a written document explaining its decision. 4.9 The committee shall disband when it is finished deciding the specific situation it was formed to examine. (This is not a standing committee.) 4.10 If a member of the IAB or the IESG survives a recall motion, the Ombudsman shall not begin another procedure against that member for at least six months after the recall vote. 5. TRANSITION 5.1 This procedure will begin January 1, 1993 with selections to be in place by the 26th IETF. 5.2 The call for volunteers and selection of the nominating committee shall be done before December 31, 1992. 5.3 The IESG will designate which positions shall be available for selection. These positions will include the Chair of the IETF. 5.4 The IAB will designate which positions shall be available for selection. These positions will include the slot currently filled by the Chair of the IAB. 5.5 The nominating committee will finish its work so that selections can be announced on March 1, 1993. 5.6 The new selectees will take office at the close of the 26th IETF. 6. STRUCTURAL CHANGES 6.1 In addition to the institution of the selection and recall procedures detailed in sections 1-5, the IAB and IESG will carry out a variety of structural changes in their internal operations and in the relationship between the two bodies. 6.2 The IESG will institute the concept of design teams and will specify how those design teams relate to working groups. 6.3 The IESG will make area directorates a standard part of the area concept. 6.4 The IESG will make decisions on standards progression. It will institute procedures that will bring more quality control towards the working group level, and will specify procedures for the progression of working group documents through the area directorates and the IESG. 6.5 The IAB will have the role of arbitrating disputes and acting as an appellate body. 6.6 The IAB will provide oversight and advice on the Internet architecture. The IAB will review working group charters and provide advice on architectural issues that may be raised by those working groups. 6.7 The IAB will continue to participate in the IETF process and may participate in working groups and issue proposals and other papers that contribute to that process. 6.8 The IAB and the IESG will periodically report back to the IETF on the status of these changes.
- v 1.2, IETF material Carl Malamud
- Change suggestion Re: v 1.2, IETF material Einar Stefferud
- Re: v 1.2, IETF material John C Klensin
- Re: v 1.2, IETF material Erik Huizer
- Re: v 1.2, IETF material Dave Crocker
- Re: v 1.2, IETF material Bob Stewart
- Re: v 1.2, IETF material John C Klensin
- Re: v 1.2, IETF material Barry M. Leiner
- Re: v 1.2, IETF material Frank Kastenholz
- Re: v 1.2, IETF material John C Klensin
- Re: Design Teams (was v 1.2, IETF material) Bob Stewart
- Re: v 1.2, IETF material Einar Stefferud
- Re: v 1.2, IETF material Dave Crocker
- Re: v 1.2, IETF material Einar Stefferud
- Re: v 1.2, IETF material Vinton G. Cerf
- Design Teams (was "v 1.2, IETF material") Gary Scott Malkin
- Re: Design Teams (was "v 1.2, IETF material") Dave Crocker
- Re: Design Teams (was "v 1.2, IETF material") Marshall Rose
- Re: Design Teams (was "v 1.2, IETF material") Bob Stewart
- Re: Design Teams (was "v 1.2, IETF material") John C Klensin
- Re: Design Teams (was "v 1.2, IETF material") Marshall Rose
- Design Teams (was "v 1.2, IETF material") Gary Scott Malkin
- Re: Design Teams (was "v 1.2, IETF material") Marshall Rose
- Re: v 1.2, IETF material Barry M. Leiner
- Re: v 1.2, IETF material Dave Crocker
- Re: v 1.2, IETF material Einar Stefferud
- Re: v 1.2, IETF material Beast (Donald E. Eastlake, 3rd)
- Re: v 1.2, IETF material Frank Kastenholz
- Re: v 1.2, IETF material Beast (Donald E. Eastlake, 3rd)
- Re: Design Teams (was "v 1.2, IETF material") James R. (Chuck) Davin
- Re: Design Teams (was "v 1.2, IETF material") John Curran
- Re: v 1.2, IETF material Einar Stefferud
- Re: v 1.2, IETF material Beast (Donald E. Eastlake, 3rd)
- Re: v 1.2, IETF material Vinton G. Cerf
- Re: v 1.2, IETF material Vinton G. Cerf
- Re: v 1.2, IETF material Beast (Donald E. Eastlake, 3rd)
- Re: v 1.2, IETF material Carl Malamud
- Re: v 1.2, IETF material Vinton G. Cerf
- Re: v 1.2, IETF material Einar Stefferud
- v 1.2, IETF material Gary Scott Malkin
- Re: Design Teams (was "v 1.2, IETF material") Bob Stewart
- Re: Design Teams (was "v 1.2, IETF material") Einar Stefferud
- Re: Design Teams (was "v 1.2, IETF material") Dave Crocker