IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Design Teams (was "v 1.2, IETF material")

Marshall Rose <mrose@dbc.mtview.ca.us> Wed, 02 December 1992 19:35 UTC

Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa17525; 2 Dec 92 14:35 EST
Received: from CNRI.RESTON.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa17516; 2 Dec 92 14:35 EST
Received: from ietf.cnri.reston.va.us by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa21470; 2 Dec 92 14:36 EST
Received: from CNRI.RESTON.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa17502; 2 Dec 92 14:35 EST
Received: from ppp.dbc.mtview.ca.us by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa21465; 2 Dec 92 14:36 EST
Received: from localhost by dbc.mtview.ca.us (5.65/3.1.090690) id AA09509; Wed, 2 Dec 92 11:34:23 -0800
To: Gary Scott Malkin <gmalkin@xylogics.com>
Reply-To: poised@CNRI.Reston.VA.US
Cc: poised@CNRI.Reston.VA.US
Subject: Re: Design Teams (was "v 1.2, IETF material")
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 02 Dec 1992 14:12:21 EST." <28106.199212021912@atlas.xylogics.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Date: Wed, 02 Dec 1992 11:34:20 -0800
Message-Id: <9506.723324860@dbc.mtview.ca.us>
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Marshall Rose <mrose@dbc.mtview.ca.us>

> It doesn't have to be that black and white; there is room for compromise.

Yes, and the compromise is the one we have now.

See Bob's message on the dynamics of this.

/mtr

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email