RE: [Policy] RE: PCELS position
David McTavish <dmctavish@sandvine.com> Wed, 24 September 2003 15:31 UTC
Received: from optimus.ietf.org (ietf.org [132.151.1.19] (may be forged)) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id LAA22236 for <policy-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Wed, 24 Sep 2003 11:31:32 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1A2Bbe-0002UP-Pn for policy-archive@odin.ietf.org; Wed, 24 Sep 2003 11:31:09 -0400
Received: (from exim@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id h8OFV6UE009565 for policy-archive@odin.ietf.org; Wed, 24 Sep 2003 11:31:06 -0400
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1A2BbZ-0002Tt-PK; Wed, 24 Sep 2003 11:31:01 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1A2Bat-0002Sv-Qq for policy@optimus.ietf.org; Wed, 24 Sep 2003 11:30:22 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id LAA22187 for <policy@ietf.org>; Wed, 24 Sep 2003 11:30:10 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1A2Bar-0006Fw-00 for policy@ietf.org; Wed, 24 Sep 2003 11:30:17 -0400
Received: from sandvine.com ([199.243.201.138] helo=mail.sandvine.com ident=hidden-user) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1A2Bar-0006Ft-00 for policy@ietf.org; Wed, 24 Sep 2003 11:30:17 -0400
Received: by mail.sandvine.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id <SZM8GY10>; Wed, 24 Sep 2003 11:30:12 -0400
Message-ID: <FE045D4D9F7AED4CBFF1B3B813C85337022B15BE@mail.sandvine.com>
From: David McTavish <dmctavish@sandvine.com>
To: "'Pana, Mircea'" <mpana@metasolv.com>, 'John Strassner ' <John.Strassner@intelliden.com>, ''Robert Moore' ' <remoore@us.ibm.com>
Cc: "''Wijnen, Bert (Bert)' '" <bwijnen@lucent.com>, David McTavish <dmctavish@sandvine.com>, "''Joel M. Halpern' '" <joel@stevecrocker.com>, "''policy@ietf.org' '" <policy@ietf.org>
Subject: RE: [Policy] RE: PCELS position
Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2003 11:30:09 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C382B0.BD3AFB00"
Sender: policy-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: policy-admin@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: policy@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/policy>, <mailto:policy-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: Policy Framework <policy.ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:policy@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:policy-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/policy>, <mailto:policy-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
One example of attribute re-use is the x500UniqueIdentifier attribute, which is defined in RFC 2256, and again used in inetOrgPerson RFC 2798. d. -----Original Message----- From: Pana, Mircea [mailto:mpana@metasolv.com] Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2003 9:47 PM To: 'John Strassner '; ''Robert Moore' ' Cc: ''Wijnen, Bert (Bert)' '; ''David McTavish' '; ''Joel M. Halpern' '; Pana, Mircea; ''policy@ietf.org' ' Subject: RE: [Policy] RE: PCELS position John, > 2) I do not believe that the word "reuse" applies when an > attribute is defined in one class, with one set of > semantics, and then is blopped into a new class with > completely different semantics. That is what I meant > by stealing an OID. I do not understand the difference in semantics that you are referring to. Let's take pcimRuleEnables one more time as example. PCLS defines it as: "An integer indicating whether a policy rule is administratively enabled (value=1), disabled (value=2), or enabled for debug (value=3)". In PCLS this attribute indicates the state of pcimRule, class mapped from PCIM's PolicyRule. In PCELS we use (but not redefine) this attribute preserving its its syntax and semantics to indicate the state of a pcimPolicyRule, class mapped from PCIMe's PolicyRule. Doesn't the attribute (I stress: the attribute not the class that uses it) have the same semantics in these two cases? Regards, Mircea.
- [Policy] PCELS position Pana, Mircea
- RE: [Policy] RE: PCELS position Wijnen, Bert (Bert)
- RE: [Policy] RE: PCELS position David McTavish
- RE: [Policy] RE: PCELS position Wijnen, Bert (Bert)
- RE: [Policy] RE: PCELS position Pana, Mircea
- RE: [Policy] RE: PCELS position Joel M. Halpern
- RE: [Policy] RE: PCELS position David McTavish
- RE: [Policy] RE: PCELS position John Strassner
- RE: [Policy] RE: PCELS position John Strassner
- RE: [Policy] RE: PCELS position Robert Moore
- RE: [Policy] RE: PCELS position Robert Moore
- RE: [Policy] RE: PCELS position David McTavish
- RE: [Policy] RE: PCELS position Pana, Mircea
- RE: [Policy] RE: PCELS position John Strassner
- RE: [Policy] RE: PCELS position John Strassner
- RE: [Policy] RE: PCELS position John Schnizlein
- RE: [Policy] RE: PCELS position John Strassner
- RE: [Policy] RE: PCELS position Pana, Mircea
- RE: [Policy] RE: PCELS position Pana, Mircea
- RE: [Policy] RE: PCELS position Pana, Mircea
- RE: [Policy] RE: PCELS position Pana, Mircea
- RE: [Policy] RE: PCELS position Pana, Mircea
- RE: [Policy] RE: PCELS position David McTavish
- RE: [Policy] RE: PCELS position John Strassner
- RE: [Policy] RE: PCELS position David McTavish
- RE: [Policy] RE: PCELS position David McTavish
- [Policy] RE: PCELS position David McTavish