Re: [port-srv-reg] FW: Merging Stuart's registry with port-numbers

+1

dbh 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: port-srv-reg-bounces@ietf.org 
> [mailto:port-srv-reg-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Lars Eggert
> Sent: Tuesday, April 12, 2011 3:31 AM
> To: Joe Touch
> Cc: port-srv-reg@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [port-srv-reg] FW: Merging Stuart's registry 
> with port-numbers
> 
> Hi,
> 
> if there are more cases like this, or more otherwise special 
> cases, we may want to make edits during AUTH48. For example, 
> allow "other" as a transport protocol tag in cases like this.
> 
> How far along with the merging are you?
> 
> Lars
> 
> On 2011-4-12, at 6:35, Joe Touch wrote:
> > That's a good question. I had argued that service names 
> were independent of the transport protocol, but given the 
> current text they aren't, so not clear how to handle it.
> > 
> > Maybe "other" or "proprietary" as the transport and leave 
> it at that informally in the registry?
> > 
> > Joe
> > 
> > On 4/11/2011 1:19 PM, Michelle Cotton wrote:
> >> All:
> >> 
> >> We are in the process of officially combining the 
> ports/service name
> >> registries.
> >> 
> >> Stuart's registry 
> (http://www.dns-sd.org/ServiceTypes.html) contains
> >> these two entries:
> >> 
> >> panoply         Panoply multimedia composite transfer protocol
> >>                 Natarajan Balasundara<rajan at ipanoramii.com>
> >>                 Primary Transport Protocol: Proprietary
> >>                 Defined TXT keys: None
> >> 
> >> parabay-p2p     Parabay P2P protocol
> >>                 Vishnu Varadaraj<vishnuv at parabay.com>
> >>                 Primary Transport Protocol: Proprietary
> >>                 Defined TXT keys: None
> >> 
> >> There is a problem with the "Proprietary" transport 
> protocol. The new
> >> port-numbers registry accepts only UDP, TCP, SCTP, or DCCP 
> as transport
> >> protocol (according to draft-ietf-tsvwg-iana-ports-10 
> section 8.1.1).
> >> 
> >> How do we deal with this one?
> >> 
> >> Thanks,
> >> 
> >> --Michelle
> >> 
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Port-srv-reg mailing list
> >> Port-srv-reg@ietf.org
> >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/port-srv-reg
> > _______________________________________________
> > Port-srv-reg mailing list
> > Port-srv-reg@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/port-srv-reg
> 
>